NEW LAW Now Charging ALL VIOLENT Protesters With Terrorism, Spread the News and SHARE THIS!!


These Protesters Are Going To Be Charged

The United States is one of the best places to live. You have rights that are given to you from the Constitution, you have the freedom to do what you want (within reason of course), and you have the ability to live in one of the strongest nations in the world.protesters-arrested-and-charged

At least it is supposed to be like that. Unfortunately there are people called liberals that want to completely destroy everything that the Constitution gives you. They want to take away your free speech because it might offend them. They want to take away your ability to have a gun because they don’t like it. And finally they want to make the country into a globalist area.

Despite the fact that the United States was founded with the Constitution being the document that gives people power, the liberals have decided that they don’t like that anymore. They are literally doing what they can to destroy any evidence of that.

More Collusion Exposed

These Two Have Proven That They Don’t Follow The Constitution

The most prominent example would be the fact that after the election was held, in which Donald Trump was the winner, entitled liberals were so angry that they decided they would go out and protest the results. Yes they were protesting the results of a FAIR election, despite the fact that there was still three million illegal votes cast.

And what do the Democratic leaders have to say about all of this? They have kept their mouths shut on the entire thing. Despite all summer long of having the liberals and their friends in the media saying that Trump needs to talk to his supporters for their “damages” caused, they haven’t done that either.

But it isn’t just the fact that the Democratic leaders are staying silent on the whole issue. There have been numerous reports that these protesters are actually getting paid by George Soros in order to create enough of a disturbance that something would get done. What the liberals want to do is stop the transfer of power.

That way Trump wouldn’t be the person in charge of the entire country. It would still be underneath President Obama. But that is what the liberals want; instead there is a new bill that is coming out that is sure to make liberals everywhere cry.

A Republican lawmaker has just come up with the perfect solution to make sure that these protesters stop acting like entitled liberals. The bill in question would allow authorities to charge protesters with committing “economic terrorism.” Washington state Senator Doug Ericksen is the one that is responsible for coming up with the bill.

 “I respect the right to protest, but when it endangers people’s lives and property, it goes too far. Fear, intimidation, and vandalism are not a legitimate form of political expression. Those who employ it must be called to account. We are not just going after the people who commit these acts of terrorism. We are going after the people who fund them. Wealthy donors should not feel safe in disrupting middle-class jobs.”


People Who Protest Like This Are Going To Get A Rude Wake Up Call

The proposed bill, which is going to pass through considering that the Republicans control the House, the Senate, and the Presidency, would make protesting a class C felony if they create any sort of “economic disruption” or “jeopardize human life and property.”

It would also mean that people that have been discovered to be in violation of this would face up to five years in prison, or a $10,000 fine, or both. Not only that, but any group that organizes a protest that is considered disruptive would also be charged with “economic terrorism.”

That means that these precious snowflakes that think they can get away with causing damage because they’re upset would have to think twice. But the saddest part about this whole thing is the fact that it was forced to be created. That was because the liberals that were protesting have a difficult time being peaceful.

 They honestly think that the best way to go about this whole thing is to make sure that they cause as much damage and destruction as possible. And their defense for it is to say that they have a right to protest. The last time I checked, protesting didn’t involve lighting trashcans on fire or smashing car windshields. That isn’t a protest; that’s a full-blown riot!

And this is what we have been seeing from the numerous protests that have been going on since the election. There are people doing whatever they can to cause as much damage and destruction as possible. And these people need to learn that they can’t get away with this any longer.

Of course the other sad part is that a vast majority of these protesters didn’t even vote in the election. They had a prime opportunity to make sure that their voices were heard and they completely ignored that. And now they decided that they want to have their voice heard by causing as much damage as possible.

But that wasn’t the worst thing that they did. There was a report on CNN that had one of the protesters promising actual DEATH just to make sure that they got what they wanted. Yes these people are so crazy that they want to have people killed just to make sure that they get what they want. It’s people like this that had the bill created in the first place.

Share this article with your friends and family to show that people that are going to be protesting and causing damage and mayhem where they go are about to get a rude wake up call. A bill is going to be passed, thanks to an all Republican Congress, which is going to make sure that these protesters face justice for causing destruction.

This is just a way to ensure that we are stronger as a country under Trump. The past eight years have taught children that it is okay to be whiny and complain about everything. That time has past. We no longer have to accept the Band-Aid generation that was seen underneath Obama. This is just the first step into making this country stronger and it is going to continue. We WILL Make America Great Again!

Read more here! 

About Red Rock Staff


  1. Betty Karlson

    November 18, 2016 at 2:51 pm

    Please un-subscribe my email from Red Rock Daily News.

    • siedlik

      January 21, 2017 at 9:24 am

      Please would somone bring me KFC bucket ?

      • JD

        January 30, 2017 at 8:37 am

        Good , you shouldn’t be here if you condone this kind of protesting anyway. Just another dropshot that won’t be missed!!

      • Jake Blake

        January 31, 2017 at 11:46 am

        And popcorn and a large Pepsi!

    • Lee

      January 21, 2017 at 1:33 pm

      No one is going to read that or act on it here….do it yourself.

    • Buda Bob Nu

      January 21, 2017 at 3:28 pm

      The truth does hurt, eh, Betty.

    • EJ

      January 21, 2017 at 6:45 pm

      Who is the scum sucking maggot(s) that wrote this bullshit? They are a threat to the US Constitution and our freedoms. Any maggot that tries to outlaw our right to protest is an enemy of the people and needs to be tried for treason and then stood before a wall and be shot dead!

      • Patricia McLaughlin

        January 25, 2017 at 8:32 am

        EJ the enemy to the people are people think like you. We are sick and tired of the fear that the Democrats and those who hate Trump are disposing upon people in order to get their way. The destruction is tenfold the disgrace is outrageous the idea that you guys think that they can spit on people burn the American flag stop on it laugh about it throw eggs on people fight disrupt and create nothing but chaos has gone too far. Turning over cop car stopping on people’s car destruction of property who in the hell do you guys think you are. You scream to get your way you act like spoiled brats no way are you an adult and quit spreading rumors that rights are being taken away who took our rights away where was Obama he took the right away that were legal and put ideas into people’s heads that it was okay to do whatever you wanted as long as you followed him and Hillary. You’re destroying our country you’re making us look like idiots other countries think we’re weak yet you guys think you’re so smart. This is and always has been to United States of America it is not the United countries if you don’t like the wall too bad we’re tired of spending billions of dollars supporting people whose countries won’t support them. And then being disrespected on top of it. Our people are losing their homes their housing our people are on the streets they can’t get support where is other people can’t there are many reasons for building this wall which seems to have started all the BS. For your information there’s always been a rule that a fence to be built it didn’t say wall but it did say a fence so it’s been and place it was just never a acted on due to Obama. Tired in hearing the noise from those who actually are not supporting our country They are tearing it apart. That’s what Obama wanted what Hillary wanted and what Soros wanted it works for them. And yet you I’ll follow as if you have no brain for yourself. Enough.


          March 20, 2017 at 8:17 am

          Band-Aid generation that was seen underneath Obama.– PERFECT

        • JulieinVa

          June 5, 2017 at 2:03 pm

          Patricia Mc Laughlin BRAVO!! Well said!

          • Susanne Ljungren

            June 7, 2017 at 10:41 am

            Right on! The right to protest is on the books. It is – “right to protest
            Peacefully”. It does not mean violently with destruction of life and property! Hopefully, this law will go through quickly!

        • Gail Tucker

          June 7, 2017 at 5:22 am

          Patricia, that was perfect!! thank you.

        • Gigi Morrison

          June 8, 2017 at 1:58 am

          Well said and I agree 100%!🇺🇸

      • Anita

        January 25, 2017 at 6:00 pm

        You have every right to protest but I have every right to be safe and my property be safe from your protesting. This proposal is about those that cross that line only and I agree with it.

        • Troy

          February 4, 2017 at 7:31 pm

          Anita, I totally agree with you. It’s only common sense, but as normal that is one thing the libtards lack!

          • HUEY

            February 5, 2017 at 2:59 pm

            in total agreement with you both

      • Mike

        January 26, 2017 at 1:51 pm

        There’s a difference between the right to protest, and paying people to protest. It’s well documented that many were paid $50/hr as professional protestors.

        In addition, and this is the bigger point, a protest should not involve looting, destruction of property, and violence. Those that commit those things should have the law thrown at them. Protestor standing shouting over a police car, no problem…. protestor standing over a police car and attempting to overturn said police car, big problem.

        • Kilkee

          September 12, 2017 at 11:28 am

          “Well documented” only in right wing websites.

      • Alan Falk

        January 26, 2017 at 10:39 pm

        Um, EJ, if your idea of “protest” includes the wanton destruction of public or private property, I’d suggest you rethink your idea of “freedom.”

        That is to say, if a “protester” trashed your car or home, would you support their “right” to do that?

        Give it more thought…

      • Jim Boo

        January 27, 2017 at 5:15 am

        I would add another $20,000 fine to the total for the victims of these crimes. I would also go on within the Bill that if your arrested and not a American Citizen or authorized to be in the United States and commit the crimes above then the sentence should be double and then deported with no chance coming back into the USA..

      • Penny

        January 27, 2017 at 6:47 pm

        It’s not to outlaw protests, it to insure that they are peaceful protests. People don’t have a right to destroy and harm others property and each other under the name of protest. That makes it a riot, which is not protected by the constitution.

      • R

        January 27, 2017 at 7:44 pm

        Nobody is taking away our right for Peaceful protest. But violent and crimnal protesters will be arrested, fined and jailed. As they should be.

      • George

        January 27, 2017 at 8:43 pm


      • Bob Davis

        January 28, 2017 at 7:46 am

        EJ, have you been a moron all your life? No one is taking away your rights to protest, just protesters that are idiots enough to think they can block freeways, burn down houses, Etc. You block a freeway that I’m driving on, you get run over.

      • Pat Thompson

        January 28, 2017 at 12:31 pm

        Protest is one thing, causing damage is another. Those people need to pay a hefty fine & serve jail time. After paying for damages. That is not their right!! They should also loose their welfare. They need to take lessons from the consevatives, we have put up with their wrong decesions long enough. We should be protesting, but
        respect others , even though
        we don’t agree with them. Time for liberals to grow up & act like adults instead of spoiled brats that don’t get their own ways.

      • KL

        January 28, 2017 at 3:19 pm

        Absolutely right. And antone destroying property should be shot also if they don’t comply and move on.

        • KL

          January 28, 2017 at 3:20 pm

          Anyone not antone.

      • n r

        January 28, 2017 at 5:33 pm

        EJ No ONE is in favor of outlawing protestors rights. Rioting and destruction of property is not a right and those who do so should be held responsible for their actions.

      • Karen

        January 28, 2017 at 8:54 pm

        Protesting is legal, always will be. Destroying cars, blocking traffic, breaking windows isn’t protesting, its criminal behavior.

      • Junior

        January 29, 2017 at 3:54 pm

        You have the right to protest you fucking moron. You don’t have the right to smash up businesses and attack people who oppose your point of view. You people are the real enemies of America. You sit back and cry, bitch and moan about things you don’t understand and even worse if you forcibly push your crazy ideology onto innocent people walking the streets at the wrong time… You are retarded and I hope when this law passes your ass gets busted. But I’m sure you won’t have the balls to act like was asshole once this law goes through

      • Bill

        January 29, 2017 at 6:42 pm

        There is no law against peaceful protesting.However there are laws against rioting.Destruction of someone else’s property,assaulting anyone who may disagree with you,impeding the flow of traffic,blocking highways so emergency vehicles can’t respond,etc…..,all criminal and should be enforced.And violators should be prosecuted.

      • Jake Blake

        January 31, 2017 at 11:39 am

        You must be here illegally, eh EJ? Either that or you didn’t read the entire article! It’s not saying protesting will be forbidden, it states destructive protesting, i.e, rioting, will be illegal and those damaging property, obstructing others economic (businesses) and autonomous freedom, and/or threatening or harming others will be arrested and thrown in the slammer or given a fine of $10,000 (and possibly more, depending on crime committed). So did you vote, EJ? Or were you not allowed to because you’re not a certified U.S. citizen and have no say in the laws of our country, anyway? You sound like a threat to people and need to leave, at any rate.

      • sonny

        February 4, 2017 at 7:04 am

        they need to take your WELFARE card away from and you wouldn’t have time for this SHIT

      • Gary

        February 4, 2017 at 8:44 am

        We do have the freedom to protest peacefully, but as soon as we damage property or others, we should be held accountable.

      • Bob Davis

        February 4, 2017 at 9:53 am

        You are too stupid to understand the title of this article and law which is, “NEW LAW Now Charging ALL VIOLENT Protesters With Terrorism, Spread the News and SHARE THIS!!”

        Since you are an a$$hat who believes in destroying my property let’s stand you in front of a wall and shoot you.

      • DC

        February 4, 2017 at 10:41 am

        I’ve got a pill that will end your woes, you Communist Piece of shit. It’s about 190 grains and works so fast you’ll never know it.

      • Bob Hucik

        February 4, 2017 at 10:41 am

        It’s sad that your mind can’t define the words that were written. The ” NEW LAW ” never stated that you could not protest, it states that if one chooses to destroy property, disrupt commerce; “I respect the right to protest, but when it endangers people’s lives and property, it goes too far. Fear, intimidation, and vandalism are not a legitimate form of political expression. Those who employ it must be called to account. We are not just going after the people who commit these acts of terrorism. We are going after the people who fund them. Wealthy donors should not feel safe in disrupting middle-class jobs.”, and anything to resemble such conduct defines a riot, creating terror in the community.
        I would like to think that you have enough education to know that you should not comment on anything that you don’t understand, nor know anything about. Bottom line, I have no right to destroy your property, block your driveway, or door to your domicile, or transmit threatening messages by phone, and social media to you or your family for fear of breaking the law and imprisonment, as well as you don’t have the right to do the same. Think it out!

      • Sgt. D

        February 4, 2017 at 2:04 pm

        I think you’ve missed the point, dirt bag. The Constitution guarantees the right to “PEACEABLY” assemble. Not to riot, not to hurt people, not to destroy private, or public property. If you can show me that in the COTUS, then you are a fucking magical unicorn. If you and your rioting I’ll even attempted to deny my, or my family’s liberty in any way, shape, or form, you would find your Bolshevik ass in the very predicament you described at the end of you stupid rant. In a body bag, baby. In a body bag. Read the Constitution for once and learn what it REALLY says. I’ll tell you it’s not the Commie, Bolshevik crap you’ve been fed by your leftist handlers. Hey, great idea, save REAL Americans ammunition and put a bullet in your own skull to save us the trouble, fucking Snowflake.

        • docbobbyk

          March 11, 2017 at 9:40 am

          Rioting bothers you, of course. You are threatening to shoot people . Well, that’s cool. Yeah, why not have some blood flowing in the streets. That will make our country great again.
          Some liberals are armed too mr tough guy.
          Please tell us what your reading of the Constitution has revealed to you. Pick out one part that means something to you and offer an explanation. We want to know what it REALLY says as interpreted by you.
          PS do a better job editing.

      • Peggy Welsh

        February 4, 2017 at 11:30 pm

        Bye Betty Snowflake. Wish I could say we’ll miss you. But that would be a lie.

      • Peggy Welsh

        February 4, 2017 at 11:36 pm

        Hey EJ, you have the right to protest with PEACEFUL ASSEMBLY. If you think that’s what we’ve put up with for way too long… Pull your head out of your rear.

      • Linda

        February 4, 2017 at 11:48 pm

        They are not trying to outlaw your right to protest. They are writing this law to protect the lives and liberties of people you don’t agree with. They are also protecting the property of people. How would you like it if they protested and decided to burn down your house. I think you would have a whole different view

      • Linda

        February 4, 2017 at 11:49 pm

        They are not trying to outlaw your right to protest. They are writing this law to protect the lives and liberties of people you don’t agree with. They are also protecting the property of people. How would you like it if they protested and decided to burn down your house. I think you would have a whole different view

      • Robert

        February 5, 2017 at 12:37 am

        Wah, wah, wah! Mommy the big bad people won’t let me Break Stuff. Now I’m mad Mommy, so I’m going to go break some more stuff. I’ll be home before curfew Mommy!

      • Joyce Lazaro

        February 5, 2017 at 3:36 am

        You have the right and freedom to “PEACEFUL” protest and the rest of our great nation has the right and freedom to not be exposed and threatened by the hate and violence of your type of protest. Grow up, learn that a civilized society has laws and rules in order to exist rather than being met with hate and name calling, violence and threats of being murdered just because everyone doesn’t agree with you! Also you need to sit down and read the Constitution and Bill of Rights and the History of this country and give THANKS to the many men and women that have fought and died to preserve the life and freedoms you have in America to be able to spew this hate and filth from your mouth without being “stood before a wall and be shot dead”!

      • RH

        February 6, 2017 at 5:25 am

        Absolutely no one is going to take anyones right to protest away, apparently you didn’t read the entire article. They are going to stop rioting and the wanton destruction of degenerate morons, like yourself, who think this is how you protest.

      • Rudy

        February 9, 2017 at 1:23 pm

        ROFL.. you read what two sentences lol… its says those who damage property, cause economic disruption, threaten police, start riots, stop traffic from moving freely.. that is by definition Terriosm lmao… educate yourselves… thats been a definition of terriosism from day one… its not recent… peaceful protest, sure.. have at it..the country was built on it… but RIOTING is not Protesting, Destroying Stores, property, police vehicles, shooting people, throwing ROCKS…thats not protesting …

      • Gary Whiddon

        February 11, 2017 at 10:00 am

        Riots aren’t “protests” – now enjoy your 5 years in prison.

      • Narbs

        February 12, 2017 at 5:23 pm

        Protesting peacefully. What the left has been promoting isn’t protesting…it’s temper tantrums, interfering with everyday Americans daily life, blocking traffic, interfering with businesses ability to do business, destruction of property, assaulting police, disorderly conduct, hate speech, violence….no need for me to go on….we all get the picture. The left riots and people are being paid to be there….that is not protesting. Plus…what are they protesting….other than the fact they hate Trump…and they can’t even tell you why they hate them…other than what they have been lied to, about the man. you are the perfect example of why the left has no power, to respect and no longevity…’re a 5th grade recess name caller and have no clue what The Constitution says and stands for. you’re a vile, disgusting, useful idiot. The progressives need people like you. You don’t know anything and you don’t care that you don’t know… long as you’re constantly upset and enraged…that is all they need you for. Keep up the good work…and be sure to ‘Hail hitler’ your puppet master…they expect you to stay in line an stay mad….even though you have no idea why.

        • Narbs

          February 12, 2017 at 5:25 pm

          My comment is to BJ….I mean EJ…….

        • katerina stepovikov

          March 3, 2017 at 8:14 am

          very well said

      • Sabrina

        March 17, 2017 at 5:24 am

        The constitution dosent give you the right to distroy proberty and hurt people and if your out there and see this and do nothing your just as responsible…you have the freedom to a peaceful march…anything else should be considered terrorist…

      • John

        March 17, 2017 at 6:28 am

        This is not about any right to protest it is about Rioting and causing mass destruction you IDGOT!

      • Nancy

        March 17, 2017 at 12:07 pm

        The First Ammendment to the Constitution, gives citizens the right “…PEACABLY to assemble, and to petition the Government for a redress of grievances.” Once violence, property damage or injury become involved, the perpetrators have exceeded their Constitutional right, and have become criminals.

      • Jessie Smith

        March 17, 2017 at 2:53 pm

        Can I come to your place and smash windows and block your driveway and spray graffiti on your house and spray you with pepper spray or mace and egg your family. I am protesting what your say, should be okay, right?

      • E. Beckham

        March 17, 2017 at 3:43 pm

        Exactly… it is comments like EJ’s that illustrates that dark mind-set that are giving reasons for laws that will outlaw and severely punish rioting, causing destruction to any property and committing violence or even threatening it by aggressive intimidation, as a legal form of protesting. Because its not legal even now and the EJ’s of the world don’t care.

      • Judy

        April 7, 2017 at 2:08 am

        Maybe you just have an inability to comprehend what was written. In the past, when people protested, they carried signs, sang songs, chanted…never violence or property damage. What this writer is talking about is threats of violence, actual violence, stopping traffic, vandalism, etc. Maybe you just aren’t able to comprehend the difference between protesting and violence. I have heard that the educational bar has been lowered.

      • will

        June 5, 2017 at 4:22 pm

        do you actually know the difference between a protest and a riot? well when you want to riot come to my house.. i can assure you when i quit shooting there wont be anyting in the street moving.. that alone without passing useless laws would put an end to riots ….

      • Michael Laborde

        June 7, 2017 at 1:23 pm

        Wow. I saw you calling yourself those names in the mirror.

    • James D. Burke

      January 21, 2017 at 7:36 pm

      What’s wrong with this article, Betty Karlson? People should have to pay for the damage they do in any setting if it is deliberate. Doesn’t anyone know what the word “sedition” implies?

      • Meredith

        January 28, 2017 at 9:23 am

        Really. It is a right to protest. Of course. No one is saying that u can’t. When u destroy businesses. Throw rocks and bricks at the police because u are mad. Or set a car on fire, that’s not protesting. That is a riot. And if u can’t tell the difference well u need to do some research. Vandalism is against the law also. Since when is it ok to do these things. I guess only when it’s suits your needs. Really.

        • Robert

          February 5, 2017 at 12:41 am

          Liberals have been liberated from common sense and reasonable thinking.

          • Rudy

            February 9, 2017 at 1:24 pm

            LOL FACT… being liberal is not what it used to be AT FREAKN ALL…this new age crapola is ridiculous

      • Jake Blake

        January 31, 2017 at 12:00 pm

        Betty is probably an illegal and couldn’t vote anyway, so she has no say in the laws of our country so should keep her mouth shut or get out. If she’s a true certified U.S. citizen and didn’t vote, then she accepts the outcome and needs to shut up. If she did vote for the other candidate who lost, then she needs to accept the outcome and abide by the laws made by the winning candidate and new president that the rest of the country voted for and agree with. It’s time to give up the 8 year Obama reign, Betty, it’s over, and now let the winners of the election pick up all the broken pieces.

    • Jodie Rivet

      January 21, 2017 at 9:13 pm

      Just make sure you have not “liked” their facebook page and you should not see their stuff anymore. Have a lovely day. 🙂

    • witznd

      January 22, 2017 at 10:21 am

      Dear Betty,
      Unless Aliens came down to your computer in the middle of the night and subscribed you to Red Rock Daily News without your knowledge, YOU are responsible to hit that, UNSUBSCRIBE link in your email. No one is responsible to do that, but you! It’s very easy, you can do this.

    • Bev

      January 22, 2017 at 3:56 pm

      Unsubscribe yourself.

    • Tracy J Everitt

      January 22, 2017 at 4:38 pm

      me, too

    • G Jilldon

      January 23, 2017 at 1:36 pm

      it’s a radical right wing christian deplorable haters group

      • Penny

        January 27, 2017 at 6:53 pm

        So G Jilldon you think because you don’t like something you have a right to destroy and harm. That is when I will use my constitutional right to put a whole through you to protect myself, family and property.

      • Jake Blake

        January 31, 2017 at 12:10 pm

        LOLOL! You didn’t read the article, right?? Either that or you’re in agreement with destroying property and harming others and you’re a felon??

      • Judy

        February 9, 2017 at 1:19 pm

        What’s radical about wanting to protect private property & upholding the Constitution?
        I don’t know about you, but I have yet to see any damage from a Tea Party rally; in fact, they leave the places they march cleaner than when they found them.

        So which side is more radical?

      • John

        March 17, 2017 at 6:32 am

        Wow such a comment I guess you believe that destroying other peoples property is okay? Just WOW!

      • Bob Davis

        March 17, 2017 at 10:40 am

        G Jilldon, come and attempt to destroy my private property or harm my wife and see how that works out for you.

        SSGT. USMC 3 years combat where I was trained to kill people and I was good at my job.


      January 26, 2017 at 8:24 am

      Betty Betty Betty Betty, you my friend are obviously a product of some really bad public education. The real meaning of a “protest” is as follows; A statement or non violent action expressing disapproval of or objection to something. NOT a violent disturbance of the peace by a crowd or mob.

    • obie moore

      February 8, 2017 at 9:07 pm

      don’t need your liberal ass on here anyway

  2. Richard Knottek

    November 18, 2016 at 7:00 pm

    Whoever authored this article is in need of some serious education. First of all, exactly NONE of our rights, come from the Constitution. That’s correct, ZERO. I won’t even bother commenting on the rest of this drivel.

    • Dana

      January 20, 2017 at 11:29 am

      Where are you from?

      • Barbara

        January 21, 2017 at 11:23 am

        He most likely means that they come from God. They are known as God given rights, according to the constitution.

    • Jessie Smith

      January 20, 2017 at 8:05 pm

      Please explain your statement, where do our rights come from?

      • Doni Doni

        January 21, 2017 at 1:22 am

        The Bill of Rights.

        • Jim Boo

          January 27, 2017 at 5:20 am

          Now you can see how stupid and uneducated the left really is. You had to explain the Bill of Rights to this uneducated person, good show.

          • Jessie Smith

            March 4, 2017 at 5:23 am

            I am not stupid, uneducated nor a lefty. I merely wanted clarification on a statement of what they believed. I forgive your insulting statement sir.

      • Sharon

        January 21, 2017 at 2:10 am

        Richard Knottek is correct.our right do NOT come from the Constitution. They come from our creator. They are Protected by the Constitution. You should try reading it and the Bill of Rights sometime.

      • NobodyofConsequence

        January 21, 2017 at 7:22 am

        The rights are preexisting. Basically the constitution recognizes the rights that are inherent to being a human being. There’s a lot of confusion on this, the government is an entity where if it’s not granted a specific power, it has no power in that area, but somehow we’ve gotten that turned around and people believe they have no power unless it’s granted by the government. That’s actually completely reversed from the true situation.

        • Pls

          February 5, 2017 at 7:18 pm

          Bottom line here people, it does not matter where they come from! It’s just good old common sense and courtesy we all grew up with, or at least should of! God gave us free will, His Commandants gave us rules to live by. How ever the are too many enemy infested liberals who do not know them. Ej and Betty, Just in case you or anyone else hasn’t read it! (memorize the part that says “PEACEABLY TO ASSEMBLE!!) The Bill of Rights: Amendment I says
          “Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof; or abridging the freedom of speech, or of the press; or the right of the people peaceably to assemble, and to petition the government for a redress of grievances”.

      • LiveFree1200cc

        January 21, 2017 at 9:10 am

        Our rights are given to us by ‘GOD’ or just by being born human, also known as human rights or inherent rights. The constitution simply tells the government what they can NOT do. It does not give us ‘right’. Its unfortunate that the 1st ten amendments are called the bill of ‘rights’ because that isnt what it really is. It tells the federal government what they can not do.

      • GaDawg

        January 21, 2017 at 9:38 am

        Our rights are derived from God. But now ask yourself this question:

      • McDooDoo

        January 21, 2017 at 9:42 am

        It’s called the Bill of Rights.

      • Frank

        January 21, 2017 at 10:23 am

        Jessie Smith: The founding principle is: “each individual is created with inherent human rights (granted by the creator or God at time of creation) whether you choose to believe in a God or not. Anything (else) is granted by government; therefore can be removed by government, and that makes them “privileges” not “rights”.

        The bill of rights merely lists these rights; and is not “all inclusive”.Meaning there are other un mentioned rights…and human rights are limited to those specified: Our founders were true far sighted geniuses.

      • Frank

        January 21, 2017 at 10:24 am

        Jessie Smith: The founding principle is: “each individual is created with inherent human rights (granted by the creator or God at time of creation) whether you choose to believe in a God or not. Anything (else) is granted by government; therefore can be removed by government, and that makes them “privileges” not “rights”.

        The bill of rights merely lists these rights; and is not “all inclusive”.Meaning there are other un mentioned rights…and human rights are NOT limited to those specified: Our founders were true far sighted geniuses.

      • cascadian12

        January 21, 2017 at 10:51 am

        According to the Declaration of Independence, the rights are given to us by our creator:

        “We hold these truths to be self-evident, that all men are created equal, that they are endowed by their Creator with certain unalienable Rights, that among these are Life, Liberty and the pursuit of Happiness. — That to secure these rights, Governments are instituted among Men, deriving their just powers from the consent of the governed…”

        The purpose of the Bill of Rights is not to establish those rights, but to limit what the government can do to “impair” those rights. For example, the government may not infringe on the right to bear arms when a militia is required, because a militia is important to the security of a free state (This is my reading. It makes no sense for the government to not be able to infringe on the right to bear arms in order to protect public safety.)

      • Scott

        January 21, 2017 at 11:34 am

        The constitution tells the government what its rights are and limits its power. It clearly states that our rights come from our creator.

      • Diogenes

        January 21, 2017 at 12:00 pm

        Same place our morality comes from.

      • Peter Lake

        January 21, 2017 at 12:10 pm

        Our rights come from God and Nature.
        The Constitution merely protects our rights from being infringed by our government.

      • Mark

        January 21, 2017 at 12:26 pm

        We hold these truth to be self-evident, that all men are created equal. That they are ENDOWED BY THEIR CREATOR with certain on alienable rights.

      • Valerie

        January 21, 2017 at 12:43 pm

        Precious snowflake, would you be so kind as to explain where our rights of an American actually come from? A box of corn flakes? Slurpee or perhaps a Grande at Starbucks? Please, we are waiting on pins and needles (safety pins) for your answer.

      • Dana

        January 21, 2017 at 1:00 pm

        Bill of Rights, the first 10 Articles if the US CONSTITUTION.

        • C Brown

          February 4, 2017 at 8:37 am

          Bill of rights are the first 10 amendments to the Constitution, not articles.

      • SomeGuy

        January 21, 2017 at 1:16 pm

        Our rights are endowed by our Creator.
        “We hold these truths to be self-evident, that all men are created equal, that they are endowed by
        their Creator with certain unalienable Rights, that among these are Life, Liberty and the pursuit
        of Happiness.” Declaration of Independence – Thomas Jefferson

      • Thomas A.

        January 21, 2017 at 1:16 pm

        Our rights come from GOD. They are acknowledged by the Constitution. Man may not give a man rights. Only GOD can do that. Man may take away a person’s rights through force of arms, but his rights are not granted by the Government. That is why we were given a free nation with the blood, sweat, and work of those that came before. While the progressive socialist have worked to suppress our GOD given rights, we have a chance not to restore them to their fullest.

      • docbobbyk

        January 21, 2017 at 1:49 pm

        According to the Declaration of Independence, we are born with unalienable rights. No document either grants those rights or, on the other hand, can take them away.

      • Dan

        January 21, 2017 at 2:20 pm

        He can’t explain what he doesn’t know. It’s his type of people that will now fill our federal prisons.

      • Citizen Vet

        January 21, 2017 at 2:54 pm

        If you would bother to read the Declaration of Independence, Constitution, and papers of the Founders, you would know that we are born with these rights as a free people, and the Constitution merely points them out, it does not give them to us.

      • latham

        January 21, 2017 at 3:02 pm

        our rights are inherent and innate. meaning that we are born with them. The constitution and bill of rights outline them but are technically documents that limit federal power. They do not “grant rights”. If your rights were granted then they would be privileges and not rights.

      • Buda Bob Nu

        January 21, 2017 at 3:27 pm

        Jesse Smith, R. Knottek does not know the answer, that is why he left the thread.

      • Brian

        January 21, 2017 at 4:53 pm

        The Constitution does not grant rights, it protects them.

      • Nunyo Business

        January 21, 2017 at 7:05 pm

        God given rights. for example. the Constitution doesnt give us the right to bear arms. thats something that is a right from God. The Constitution just says that the government has no right to change that. abridge that, that is : The goverment cant restrict, curtail, or do away with that right.. it is. and it will stay that way.. any attempt to do that is wrong.

        • Darren knivht

          January 21, 2017 at 7:38 pm

          So , God created guns?

        • Sheryl lima

          January 21, 2017 at 8:08 pm

          First of all the Constitution does give us the right to bear I hope they do pass a law to stop the paid for protestors hurting cops distroying property an promoting hate. That is not free speech that is criminal acts. An jail an fines to PEOPLE responsable should be done maybe it would stop the evil people trying to distroy America an bring order back to our country. Obama closed his eyes to all of the protesters I mean riots..They weren’t protesting they were hateful riots. It needs to be stopped an this law will have a lot of peoples VOTE..Pass it an this includes movie stars that are promoting hate. Slut madanna said to blow up White House.( To late Obama’s gone lol) anyway homeland security were are you ..Threats no matters who should be arrested jailed an fined

        • Eldridge McMuffin

          January 22, 2017 at 12:07 am

          Owning a gun is a God-given right.

          Thanks for the laugh.

        • willywonka

          January 22, 2017 at 12:40 am

          god doesn’t exist how can a mythological being actually help with anything wow religion has really brain washed you hasn’t it . your really drinking the wine a lot aren’t you .

          • C Brown

            February 4, 2017 at 8:42 am

            Well, goody, willywonka. Then you can forget all your “rights”, since they devolve from a Creator that you deny.

          • Bob Davis

            February 4, 2017 at 9:46 am

            God exist, willywonka is a cartoon character. Go, unaccompanied, and be fruitful.

        • Erik

          January 22, 2017 at 5:39 am

          oh i remember in the bible thou shall have the right to bear arms and drink beer… yea its right here in my lap bible :/ smh

        • distant drummer

          January 22, 2017 at 6:41 am

          Since when does the Bible give us the right to own guns?

        • David

          January 22, 2017 at 6:48 am

          God gave you the right to bear arms? Are you really that stupid?

        • Marcia Mahew

          January 22, 2017 at 11:20 am

          Omg. No God gave a right to have guns. You may want to go back to school.

        • Tj

          January 22, 2017 at 2:19 pm

          Don’t be an idiot, those a who don’t believe in God have the same rights guaranteed by the Constitution

        • Jack Frost

          January 22, 2017 at 2:52 pm

          God didn’t give anybody anything. Take your religious beliefs out of the discussion of law before you get hurt. It is proven time and time again that mixing religious beliefs with legal systems is the downfall of the society. If you don’t believe it, look at the shithole known as the Middle East for 2,000 years of evolutionary oppression due to religious fervor.

          • Bob Hucik

            February 4, 2017 at 10:55 am

            Jack Frost,
            I beg to differ with you. You are right now spewing out to the world your Humanism beliefs, which is a religion of itself hold true to the teachings of all the philosophies of the world. So, you are talking to yourself, not having the intelligence to recognize that you do serve a god of your choice. So, now, what are you trying to say?

          • Bob Davis

            February 4, 2017 at 11:32 am

            So, by your mindless dribble, you have proved, 1. You have no education. 2. You believe in Freedom of Speech ONLY as it applies to you.

            Go, unaccompanied, and be fruitful.

        • Liberal Hater

          January 22, 2017 at 3:17 pm

          What utter tripe! God didn’t give guns man did and the constitution gives you the right to bare arms as part of man made laws! Don’t bring god in to it because if god wanted to then he/she/it would destroy all guns! Men kill men it’s been that way since the cavemen and until we become enlightened it will stay that way!

        • Anominous

          January 22, 2017 at 4:53 pm

          No such thing as god given rights, as god does not exist.

        • Karin L. White

          January 22, 2017 at 4:54 pm

          You are a complete idiot, and this article is absurd. First of all, if a law is passed (or if they TRY to pass it) that takes away my right to protest, it also takes away YOUR right to protest. Since protest is, even more than money, a form of speech, it is protected by the first amendment to the Constitution. Anyone who says otherwise is blowing it out of his ass.

          • Patricia McLaughlin

            January 25, 2017 at 8:24 am

            Maybe you should read the article better it it is not taking the right to protest away it’s taken the right to protest under certain ways. I don’t care if you believe in God or not that doesn’t matter unfortunately for you what matters is how you protest it is unacceptable and surely was never meant to destroy property to spit on people to burn our flags to say you’re going to kill people blow up the White House at cetera etcetera etcetera it meant you speak your peace but you do not react in ways of hate. The stupidity in this country is gone far too long you people who protest so radically to get your way and put fear in people are out of control and it’s time it stopped. Don’t spread rumors that it takes your right away to protest it takes your right away to protest with hate.

          • Penny

            January 27, 2017 at 7:09 pm

            This doesn’t take away anyone’s right to protest, it says that when you do protest you don’t have the right to destroy, block and harm any person or property. Because that would be a riot and that is against the law.

          • Meredith

            January 28, 2017 at 9:36 am

            Karen white. What they are trying to pass isn’t against protesting. No one has an issue with being able to protest. When windows and businesses are being destroyed and cars on fire and rocks and bricks being thrown at people. People getting hurt. That’s not a protest. That is a riot. And that is illegal. And if u can’t protest without destroying or hurting people. Then maybe one needs to rethink their strategy that is why our country is great. Your views or my views should not hurt anyone. We all have our own minds. We need to watch our actions when we voice our views. Cause not everyone feels the same

          • JD

            January 30, 2017 at 8:47 am

            It takes your right away to destroy property not to protest. There’s a difference in the two numbnuts, fine if you want to protest but destroy my property and get your ass shot!

        • Ronald Fields

          January 22, 2017 at 8:56 pm

          God gave us the right to defend ourselves… Jesus said to sell your cloak and buy a sword…

        • T Poydence

          January 23, 2017 at 12:14 pm

          Are you people f’n NUTS?????? God gives us the right to have GUNS? No wonder this countries so F’d up. You wacko’s that have NEVER READ the Constitution are as stupid as you are crazy. SOROS did NOT pay the millions of people that marched all over the world yesterday. I know I SURE AS HELL didn’t SEE a CENT. And if you think you can take women’s rights away without a fight, you’re dumber than I thought. THERE IS NO FELONY in pecafuly protest, OUR RIGHTS ARE PROTECTED BY THE CONSTITUTION OF THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, and it will take hell and high water to change our first amendment rights just as it would’ve for Obama to take all our guns. Get your heads out of your assses and think and read for a change, it will do our WHOLE country a world of good if you morons learn something for a change. PS- GOD, as his son Jesus taught us, will be on our side, of love, peace and humanity.

          • Choad

            February 5, 2017 at 6:55 pm

            I know God never gave you the right to slaughter children in the name of convenience

        • Joellen

          January 23, 2017 at 1:49 pm

          It has and never be that you can violently riot and cause harm to people or property.It has never been your right to walk all over other people’s rights by destruction of them or their properties It has never been your right to commit murder.It has never been any bodies right to take control of a nation and invade it with banned people.It has never been your right to kill your babies.It has never and will never been your right to destroy a country.So you think what you want buts it’s not your right to take away our right PERIOD.

        • Jessie Smith

          January 23, 2017 at 5:22 pm

          Okay, just trying to get clarification.

      • Walter

        January 21, 2017 at 7:23 pm

        They come from God. They are natural rights.

      • James McDowell

        January 21, 2017 at 7:57 pm

        He is correct. You’re rights come from God. HOWEVER, the article has a lot of great points.

      • Holyshityou'redumb

        January 21, 2017 at 8:21 pm

        This thing called “The Bill of Rights”, You fucking morons.

      • Bud Tuggly

        January 21, 2017 at 9:08 pm

        Richard is absolutely correct.
        All rights are endowed by our creator. They are endowed at birth. Not by the Constitution.
        The Constitution forbids the government from encroaching upon those rights…period. Try reading the Constitution and the Declaration of Independence, sometime…it is spelled out quite clearly.
        So, the next time that you claim to have “Constitutional Rights”… Step back and remember…you are not a party to the document and you have no Constitutional Rights, whatsoever.

      • James Allen

        January 21, 2017 at 9:16 pm

        According to the authors of the constitution, out rights come from God. That said, you are born with them. The constitution does not give the people rights. It states what rights government may not deprive the people of.

      • Spencer

        January 22, 2017 at 8:18 am

        Don’t rights come from the “Bill of Rights” amendment to the constitution? After long, philosophical dialogues about natural, inalienable rights?

        Because there is no god.

      • Bob Davis

        January 28, 2017 at 7:47 am

        All of our rights come from God.

    • GeneG

      January 21, 2017 at 7:56 am

      Your rights come from the Creator, the Constitution tells the government what it CANNOT do.

    • Michael Dobson

      January 21, 2017 at 8:07 am

      Seriously?!! Have you ever heard of the Bill of Rights? That’s in the Constitution!!!! Really sir get an education!

      • Bob Davis

        January 28, 2017 at 7:48 am

        You get an education. Read the King James Bible and learn

    • La Vern

      January 21, 2017 at 1:42 pm

      If they don’t come from the Constitution Richard, then where do they come from. In my school I was always taught that our rights came from the Constitution of the United States. If you are correct, please explain what all of the amendments are for. Article 1…freedom of speech, press, etc. It sounds like to me that you are the one who is in need of some serious education.

      • Ellen

        January 28, 2017 at 7:40 pm

        you have the right to a peaceful protest not destroying property, blocking traffic are setting fire to any thing that is all against the laws of America your right to protest is a right given to you but does not include in the destruction of property are murder are fire are blocking traffic so people cannot get to and from work are an ambulance cannot come through to save a life those are not rights those are acts of aggression and violence which is against the Constitution are the bill of rights and American law. So read the complete statements and you will find all that out. No one will be arrested unless you breaking the law then you will and should be.

    • Mnbyoung

      January 21, 2017 at 1:58 pm

      Richard, why make such a stupid remark? And the reason you “won’t even bother to comment on the rest of this drivel” is because your one lie / stupid remark, is all you have.

    • David

      January 21, 2017 at 3:41 pm

      Where are you from? Our rights are imbedded in the first 10 amendments of the US Consitution

    • Mike Henderson

      January 21, 2017 at 4:58 pm

      it absolutely is part of the constitution fool. The Bill of Rights is the first ten amendments to the United States Constitution

    • DrLyndaHP

      January 21, 2017 at 6:11 pm

      Uh, have you READ the Constitution, numb nuts? Our RIGHTS come from the, you guessed it, Bill of Rights which are the first 10 amendments TO the Constitution. Where did you go to school? Or did you?

    • EJ

      January 21, 2017 at 6:46 pm

      did you bump your head Richard? Have you ever heard of THE BILL OF RIGHTS?

    • John Galt

      January 21, 2017 at 8:15 pm

      What he is saying, I think, is all of our rights come from God.

    • Randall

      January 21, 2017 at 9:58 pm

      You are correct! None of our rights come from the U.S. Constitution! They come from God, our Creator! However, the U.S. Constitution is supposed to protect our rights, except our corrupt government wants to diminish our rights.

    • Wade

      January 21, 2017 at 10:07 pm

      Sorry but it isn’t drivel. Yes people have the right to protest but not the right to destroy other peoples livelihood

    • Robert

      January 21, 2017 at 11:00 pm

      How old were you when you were dropped on your head which caused the brain damage?

    • Steven Weiss

      January 22, 2017 at 12:48 am

      Go back to the country you belong in. Where you get this idea our rights do not come from the Constitution? And yes please do not comment on the rest. You have already shown us how ignorant you are.

    • William Schaffer

      January 22, 2017 at 8:40 am

      everybody is waiting for your response. Since you claim so much…Educate us.

    • Deplorable Me

      January 22, 2017 at 9:10 am

      Serious right now? Constitution IS THE BILL OF RIGHTS. (First ten)

    • Hydguy

      January 23, 2017 at 10:17 am

      Actually, some do, such as the right to not quarter troops in our homes, the right to a trial by a jury of our peers, and the right to be secure in our homes and papers.
      You are confusing those with natural rights, such as the right to keep and bear arms, the right to free speech, the right to practice our religion.

    • G Jilldon

      January 23, 2017 at 1:35 pm

      a true hitleresque idiot

    • Dennis G Davis

      January 23, 2017 at 6:27 pm

      That is probably true if you are from Iran.

    • E A Kohl

      January 24, 2017 at 11:43 am

      R K _ Pray tell where do our rights come from if not the Constitution? If your answer is God, then please tell us how we use His rights in an orderly, civil manner as a country?

    • Penny

      January 27, 2017 at 6:57 pm

      A constitutional right can be a prerogative or a duty, a power or a restraint of power, recognized and established by a sovereign state or union of states. All constitutional rights are expressly stipulated and written in a consolidated national constitution, which is the supreme law of the land

    • Lynda

      February 4, 2017 at 10:57 pm

      They come from the Bill of Rights which is actually part of the Constitution of The United States of America. The Bill of Rights is the first 10 Amendments of the Constitution of The United States. Perhaps more reading and less mouthing and name calling.

  3. Douglas

    November 18, 2016 at 7:45 pm

    Charge class 3 felony. Throw them in prison. Then they can go back to school when the pay for their classes in full.

    • Patrick

      January 21, 2017 at 9:56 am

      If you’d like you can try it. Prison is not vacation. A Class C felony ALSO ensured we NEVER have our decisions I fluenced by any vote of theirs for LIFE. They cannot ever be a govt official, never will be responsible for protecting anyone. I love this idea.
      10,000 fine, inviting privileges (and yes that IS a privilege), and then even McDonald won’t hire them.

    • Laura

      January 21, 2017 at 11:52 am

      Actually many prisoners get a free education while in prison. No student loans plus free electricity, heat, three meals a day they are better off than our mentally ill or homeless population.

    • Citizen Vet

      January 21, 2017 at 2:58 pm

      So Douglas, how would you classify the Boston Tea Party? How about a Tea Party rally today, with some hooligans up to no good who go and spray paint something or break a window, and then the entire Tea Party is cast as a terrorist organization and subject to prosecution? See any potential problems with this law? Now, I am vehemently opposed to idiots who destroy property when they protest, but we already have laws for that. And people who do that are prosecuted all the time. This is merely trying to tamp down on any dissent, and that is the road to fascism, my friend. Go read up on the Nuremberg Laws, circa 1935.

    • EJ

      January 21, 2017 at 6:47 pm

      SCREW YOU NAZI! I have your charge!

    • Karin L. White

      January 22, 2017 at 4:55 pm

      Absurd. Protest is speech, and protected by the first amendment.

    • Marci Black

      January 22, 2017 at 5:25 pm

      wow…..I think that’s what they should do to you….I know your secrets you child predator

    • Mario Eufemio

      January 23, 2017 at 4:10 pm

      The state has a right to protect the interest of the public and its security from lawless elements of the society. It must be done to instill discipline and responsibility among the people and its citizens and respect the law.

    • Suz

      January 23, 2017 at 8:09 pm

      As a multiple college degreed individual your statements are reprehensible and ignorant

  4. Gregg Keyes

    November 19, 2016 at 5:42 am

    If the get away driver of a bank robbery can be charged with murder because her partner shot someone inside the bank, then rioters should be held liable for damages and assaults when they riot even though they may not have actually thrown the rock!. They are complicit, they encouorage and promote the actions of violence. They mus tnot be allowed to walk home and revel in their destruction and pain.

    • Hannu

      January 21, 2017 at 6:18 pm

      Spoken with wisdom. Thank you!!

    • Dean long

      January 21, 2017 at 9:56 pm

      Yes sir your right except that the person or people who are paying for this gets slam dunked total treason charges.

    • Lea C Guzzetta

      January 22, 2017 at 8:39 am

      Rosa Parks refused to sit in the back. But she did not destroy the bus.

  5. Koa

    November 19, 2016 at 5:57 am

    The Constitution does not grant us anything. What it does do is guarantee (protects) the rights provided to us by God as free individuals.

    • LiveFree1200cc

      January 21, 2017 at 9:11 am

      Yes, thank you

    • Buda Bob Nu

      January 21, 2017 at 3:29 pm


    • Mike Henderson

      January 21, 2017 at 4:59 pm

      The Bill of Rights is the first ten amendments to the United States Constitution

    • Me

      January 21, 2017 at 7:04 pm

      God has nothing to do with it. God wasn’t even in the Pledge of All. until the 1950s.

    • Tj

      January 22, 2017 at 2:26 pm

      The are those American citizens who don’t believe in God but still have the same constitutional rights granted to all American citizens.

  6. Wayne Miller

    November 21, 2016 at 12:40 am

    From Australia: Isn’t it a pity that SOROS happens to be a friend of the Clintons. Otherwise he would be dead by now!!


      January 20, 2017 at 7:10 pm


      • Nancy Lindley

        January 21, 2017 at 5:46 am

        My information has it that Chelsea Clinton married a gangster’s son in the George Soros’ house. Check out your information before posting.

      • TexCat

        January 21, 2017 at 12:24 pm

        That’s incorrect. He is no relation to George Soros.

      • Valerie

        January 21, 2017 at 12:45 pm

        No … Chelsea’s father in law is not Soro’s.

      • RJM

        January 21, 2017 at 1:21 pm

        Robert Voj only a minor correction to your post. Chelsea Clintons husband is Geo. Soros’ grandson.

      • mimi

        January 21, 2017 at 3:11 pm

        Yes EXACTLY !

      • Terry

        January 21, 2017 at 4:16 pm

      • Finnur J:

        January 22, 2017 at 4:51 am

        So he is married to 2 women ?

      • Leah

        January 22, 2017 at 12:23 pm

        Its actually his nephew. The nephew’s father, Edward is who embezzled more than $10 million dollars from people via both a Ponzi scheme and the Nigerian e-mail scams, and was found guilty of fraud in 2001.

      • Bigguy

        January 22, 2017 at 10:12 pm

        That is False, it’s unclear where it was “discovered” that Marc Mezvinsky was the nephew of George Soros, as this claim is demonstrably untrue. The billionaire has one brother, Paul Soros, who has two children, Peter and Jeffrey Soros. Therefore, George Soros has two nephews, Peter Soros and Jeffrey Soros, and neither of these people is Marc Mezvinsky.

  7. Pingback: SPECIAL REPORT ~ URGENT ~ BREAKING NEWS – Let Our Voices Echo

  8. SuperTech86

    November 22, 2016 at 10:40 am

    “At least it is supposed to be like that. Unfortunately there are people called liberals that want to completely destroy everything that the Constitution gives you. They want to take away your free speech because it might offend them. They want to take away your ability to have a gun because they don’t like it. And finally they want to make the country into a globalist area.”

    Whomever wrote this needs to get off the Internet and read some books as they clearly have no idea what’s been going on in this country for the last century. Foreign and domestic policy has always been dictated by those that own the means of production, christ Adam Smith even wrote about this and that was over 150 years ago.

    You also might want to learn about neoliberalism and the rise of the police state.

    • John

      January 21, 2017 at 7:50 am

      Ahh sorry the constitution does give you free speech and the right to own a gun ahh 2nd amendment. Who are you Hillary geez.

  9. mrsdondarrian

    November 22, 2016 at 11:04 am

    So the republican destruction of the Constitution has begun, just like Trump promised. He vowed to get rid of the first Amendment and here is a lying website full of falsehoods PUSHING for the destruction of our liberties and our Constitutional protections that MY forefathers fought so hard and died for.
    Go ahead and disband your lying website, creep.

    • KDMMDC

      January 20, 2017 at 10:45 pm

      You are the biggest liar he NEVER Promised or Vowed to get rid of first amendment!! You are a lying liberal listening to the MSM and mostly lying CNN!!

      • 718720

        January 21, 2017 at 8:18 am

        Don’t be stupid. Everyone knows CNN is full of it. They can’t even be bothered to use proper grammar most of the time.

      • LiveFree1200cc

        January 21, 2017 at 9:13 am

        Exactly! Isnt it bizarre how these wackos think?

      • dwayne johnson

        January 21, 2017 at 10:56 am

        MRS DON OUR CONSTITUTION WAS TO RUINED BY THE DEMS IF THE KILLER GOT IN BY SHE DIDNT BECAUE WE VOTED THE BEST PRESIDENT EVER IN. what were the fema camps for y would our 2nd ammedment be taken from us thats the right to bear arms . and should i continue know your facts befor you open your pie hole.Do some research asshole.We dodged a bullet and you librals shoul be kissing donald trumps feet sorus cant pay you forever

      • docbobbyk

        January 21, 2017 at 1:52 pm

        He didn’t explicitly promise to get rid of the 1st Amendment but has threatened reprisal against news organizations and reporters. That is at the least an attack on the 1st Amendment.

      • MonicaG

        January 22, 2017 at 12:21 am

        Oh sweetie, you seem so upset. Why don’t you just pick up your marbles and head on home. Mummy will give you some milk and cookies.

      • Ed stout

        January 22, 2017 at 1:42 pm

        Yes, we have never heard this either. The biggest problem is that we a citizens have gotten away from God and his word! First we as a society must repent and say with God’s plan for us.

    • Talan Bates

      January 21, 2017 at 8:32 am

      If I, as an individual, go out an block a major highway, smash in a window, burn a vehicle, loot, or disrupt the business of a legitimate business, I will be subject to prosecution under the law. So tell me………….what makes it OK for a group of “protesters” to do the same and on a much larger scale???? You break the law, you pay the price. PERIOD. Mob mentality does not make wrong right!!!!!

    • Don

      January 21, 2017 at 2:42 pm

      We have NEVER been guaranteed the right to loot, and destroy property. Tell me which amendment guarantees the right to break windows, overturn police cars, assault cops, etc. You need to read the article more closely. Normal protesting is not what will get a person arrested. But when protesters become violent and destructive, they are no longer PROTESTING, they are looting, and need to got to jail for that. And if you do not agree, then you are part of the problem.

    • Rick

      January 21, 2017 at 4:06 pm

      You are a FN retard

    • Michael Laborde

      January 21, 2017 at 4:15 pm

      The constitution does not give you the right to destroy property, attack people or steal. Put that in your pipe and smoke it. That is all savagery.

    • Walter l Heitman

      January 21, 2017 at 4:21 pm

      What does the first amendment have to do with rioting and destruction of public and private property?

    • Yannik Anglehart

      January 21, 2017 at 5:34 pm


    • Mistermister

      January 22, 2017 at 6:34 am

      WOW! SERIOUSLY! I can’t believe you just wrote that! You better go back to school and learn about the Constitution and our history. *SMH* And, SHOW me where he VOWED to get rid of the first amendment! If parent would teach their children correct manners, morals, respect, etc., etc. we wouldn’t be having all these problems! Oh, and since WHEN, and where does the Constitution give you the RIGHT to riot???? Here, go learn

    • Leah

      January 22, 2017 at 12:29 pm

      The law is for peaceful protest. I can’t say that even a small percentage is peaceful. Destruction, the hate spewing, the ridiculous whining. You would think that eventually, people would get tired and want to grow up. Trump has been president for 2 days and all the judging of him before he really even does anything is ridiculous.

    • Tj

      January 22, 2017 at 2:29 pm

      You lying POS the protection of the Constitution has begun, thanks to President Trump.

    • John DeVincentis

      January 23, 2017 at 9:45 am

      Love this tweet. now I can leave the page knowing that not everyone is a fear mongering that will believe anything.

  10. Jon Doe

    November 22, 2016 at 1:18 pm

    If this is TRUE,
    then it would be a Great step in the correct direction.

    Contain the Criminal element.

    • Leftnorright

      January 22, 2017 at 10:51 am

      The government is trying to make everyone a criminal. How do you propose we stop that?

    • Suz

      January 23, 2017 at 8:10 pm

      Jondoe you ARE the problem

  11. Ben Franklin

    November 22, 2016 at 4:45 pm

    Right wing totalitarian BS…. On our way to North Korean type government with this clown in charge. Screw Drumph. Republicans screwed us on our Fourth Amendment rights now that want to lock you up for First Amendment. This article is bullshit.

    • Jessie Smith

      January 20, 2017 at 8:09 pm

      There is a difference between freedom of expression and rights of assembly when it involves terrorism tactics of smashing and burning property. That’s what these folks got locked up for, I saw it live on the Communist News Network and they weren’t Republicans doing it.

      • 718720

        January 21, 2017 at 8:20 am

        First of all, destruction of property, vandalism, etc. All have laws already in place. Secondly, that does not a terrorist make. Some people are misguided genuinely, look at how young and stupid most of them are.

      • Brandi

        January 21, 2017 at 1:30 pm

        They called him Drumph because that was his great grandfather’s original name then his grandfather (I think it was this one) who changed it to Trump.

      • Rick

        January 21, 2017 at 4:09 pm

        Right On ! They “libturd socialist” don’t care about facts or the law

      • Decrescentish

        January 22, 2017 at 1:33 pm

        Did the First Amendment say that the protestors can destroy property or threaten to kill people? I don’t think so!

      • Liberal Hater

        January 22, 2017 at 3:22 pm

        Funny that 1.8 million women march in DC and 10 million across the nation and not one single arrest….. so what does that mean? And on Inauguration Day 2 men with hammers that were arrested after smashing a McDonalds window turned out to be extreme right wing members of the White Jesus army and Trump supporters…. what does that say?
        Be careful what you wish for because the law being proposed here is the number 1 law in every police state in existence and as a conservative I would hate to see it!!

        • Bob Davis

          March 4, 2017 at 7:26 am

          Two? And you think that means anything? You seem to blame PRESIDENT Trump for that yet ignore obozo the clown who caused blacks to destroy millions in property, disrupt movement, murder cops and just plain regular citizens. Ya, you’re right, 2 nuts said they were PRESIDENT Trump supporters. Big deal. Live with i.

    • KDMMDC

      January 20, 2017 at 10:48 pm

      What a idiot you are. And how childish calling our President Drump but then I have come to expect that from all liberals. Grow the heck up!!! How were you screwed on the fourth amendment and being a domestic terrorist is not a right under no amendment.

      • Thomas long

        January 21, 2017 at 10:45 am

        So it was OK for you call Obama all kind of names but now Trump is president it becomes a
        Problem. When conservatives showed pictures of lynching Obama you said nothing it was first amendment rights and when some ass does what conservative asses have done it becomes a sin. When a republican governor calls for open bloody rebellion also Trumps favorite sherif does the same did you say anything?

      • docbobbyk

        January 21, 2017 at 1:56 pm

        And unfortunately you meet the expectations of being illiterate. Go back to grammar school.

      • Frank McMurray

        January 22, 2017 at 11:18 pm

        Childish? Drumph is his real family name that they changed to trump.
        But certainly no more childish than your republican friends who called the past president Barack Hussein Obama in order to insinuate he was a Muslim. When in reality he’s professed his Christian faith publicly many many times and attended a Protestant Christian church about a 1000 times more often than Donald ever has.

    • Candace Gonzalez

      January 21, 2017 at 1:53 pm

      You must be reading the same drivel as Mrs Dondarrian. Total tripe without any basis in reality.

    • Barbara Kingston

      January 21, 2017 at 2:30 pm

      Destruction of property is against the law last time I looked. No new laws needed. Arrest them one and all as accomplices.

    • Mike Henderson

      January 21, 2017 at 5:00 pm

      get over it snowflake

    • Cynthia Bromback

      January 21, 2017 at 6:14 pm

      These protesters have no right to be violent and destructive. There is no protection for that! It is stated..Peaceful assembly to protest.

    • Michael

      January 22, 2017 at 12:05 am

      Hahahahahaha what a buncha cry babies

    • Big Bob

      January 22, 2017 at 12:37 pm

      Here’s the bottom line…IF you don’t like it here, you are free to leave anytime you want.

  12. Pingback: SPECIAL REPORT ~ URGENT ~ News and Videos – Let Our Voices Echo

  13. Norm Harrison

    November 23, 2016 at 10:51 am

    Wow – just came across this on Facebook. This is some seriously paranoid shit from some real nut cases. “Taking away guns” is not the same as having proper background checks. No Dem has asked for guns to be taken away. Repeat: NONE. And protestors are not protesting his election – they are protesting his hatred and bigotry. What a bunch of asshats. p.s. I am a Republican. Just not a crazy one. Where the hell did my party go anyway?

    • Robert Huckfeldt

      January 20, 2017 at 8:09 am

      You’d better start paying attention to what those in ‘your party’ have actually said. Several if them have said they wish they could outlaw the civilian ownership of firearms. The biggest one that comes to mind is Dianne Feinstein back in 1993 or 1994. She was quoted as saying that ‘if she could have got the votes, it would have been “Mr. and Mrs. America, turn’em all in”.’ Now, what does that mean? This is the level of gun control that many democrats are working for. They understand the logic that the founding fathers put in the Declaration Of Independence. The line that says “all experience hath shewn that mankind are more disposed to suffer, while evils are sufferable than to right themselves by abolishing the forms to which they are accustomed.” As long as you encroach on liberty one little step at a time, you’ll probably get away with it for quite some time. This is what has happened in this country with firearms. Think about this. If we were to undo all firearm laws that have been enacted since (and including) the 1934 National Firearms Act (the big one that started the current trend) and put them all together in one comprehensive plan to pass today, what do you think would happen? All of those restrictions at one time? People would go nuts! But, it was done one little bit at a time and it became a form each generation became accustomed. Please do not insult the intelligence of those who pay attention any further with such statements as ‘no one wants to take the guns’.

      • 718720

        January 21, 2017 at 8:21 am

        He just said he was a Republican. You people are really amazing though.

      • LiveFree1200cc

        January 21, 2017 at 9:14 am

        Norm is a brain dead liberal, he probably didnt even read your response

      • cascadian12

        January 21, 2017 at 11:33 am

        The laws are always responsive to events. Laws are not written to prevent things that have not yet happened. No one has ever protested the right to own a gun for hunting or in self defense. But then mass shootings started to happen more and more frequently (about 350 per year now; a mass shooting being defined as 4 or more people). So, yes, reasonable people want background checks to ensure people buying guns are mentally stable. In addition, the technology has become increasingly lethal. We banned machine guns in 1934 in response to organized crime, but now have AR-15s, etc.

        I’m sure YOU have all the guns you need and then some. There are over 300 million guns in this country and very weak gun control laws. To think the government or liberals are after your guns is delusional and obviously not supported by the facts.

      • cascadian12

        January 21, 2017 at 11:40 am

        This will get deleted, but people like you are directly responsible for the murders at Sandy Hook School.

      • docbobbyk

        January 21, 2017 at 2:03 pm

        But I don’t want to take away all guns. I just want magazine restrictions and regulations that prevent private citizens from owning military style weapons designed for specific purpose of killing more human beings faster and more effectively. And more effective registering of weapons and better background checks. And strict carry laws.
        Yes, there are people who want to take away all guns. I oppose them.
        And there are people who want to make automatic weapons and other military weapons available for private use. Do you oppose them?

      • Roger Lutz

        January 22, 2017 at 8:25 am

        Well Said…

    • neil

      January 21, 2017 at 3:38 am

      Wow you are all over the place. Certain weapons were taken. Pull that head out your ass. I’ll wait for the pop. Where’s the hatred and bigotry. Protest don’t involve violence read up on the difference. Maybe you aren’t as republican as you claim

    • John Weathers

      January 21, 2017 at 4:34 am

      Yo Norm, hillary herself said she wanted Australian style gun control here and that means turning in all guns you idiot!

      • Jessie Smith

        March 6, 2017 at 3:58 pm

        Yep, and right after the Aussies picked up most of the guns, their crime rate began to climb rapidly.

    • Gregory Pentz

      January 21, 2017 at 6:58 am

      Norm Harrison take a chill pill and calm down . If you read this article correctly and I do not know if it is true It said this bill would be passed to stop violent protests . This should have been done a long time ago. Tell me what is right about all these black people burning and looting and blocking traffic and under Obama , they were getting away with it . They were just being contained Hell the Mayor of Baltimore condoned it and told her police force to stand down and let them get it out of their system . Since when did we get where all these people can act like a bunch of barbarians and get away with it ? Time to put a halt to all this bullshit. If people want to protest that is their right , but when it runs over into violent actions time to pull the trigger on this and lock them up and charge them as domestic terrorist , I f you look under the definition of a domestic terrorist , this would fit the bill People should be fore this not against it , ask all those people that had cars destroyed or merchandise stolen or business burned and looted , traffic blocked . Time for these animals to start paying for this criminal activity

    • Ralph Jones

      January 21, 2017 at 1:35 pm

      Bullshit. Senator Feinstein said she would force everyone to turn in there guns if she had the power to do so. She said that during the blight called the clinton presidency.

    • Barbara Kingston

      January 21, 2017 at 2:31 pm

      #NOTMYPRESIDENT is protesting his election. Get out of here with your lies.


      January 21, 2017 at 2:42 pm

      Anyone can SAY they’re a Republican and then dole out their trash talk ! I give you, as an example, JOHN McCAIN, LINSAY GRAHAM and PAUL RYAN . . . . It’s a common tactic !

    • Rosie

      January 21, 2017 at 9:41 pm

      You are wrong both Oboma and the Clinton said have tried to take our guns away. They have also lied to get the media on there side and had them lie lie and lie some more to get ready to defile our President Trump. Please try not to listen to bull and investigate for yourself. May GOD BLESS you and help you see the truth. God bless everyone.

    • yokeddruid

      January 21, 2017 at 10:04 pm

      By making it harder and harder for you to own a gun , carry a gun they have in fact taken away your right to bear arms. So you are saying that the GOVERNMENT should DECIDE if we can own a GUN! Because that is what GUN CONTROL IS it is GIVING CONTROL OF YOUR RIGHT TO BEAR ARMS TO THE GOVERNMENT! Which is TOTALLY STUPID! The FOUNDING FATHERS did include the 2nd Amendment so we could hunt, sport, or self protection. It was put there so we could kill Tyrants. Maybe you should spend sometime READING THE CONSTITUTION ,THE PREAMBLE AND THE BILL OF RIGHTS.

    • Tracy

      January 22, 2017 at 10:50 am

      A sane voice, there were a couple others. Talk about fake news. I try to remember most people are not so crazy and one must check their sources.

  14. Barbara Tutor

    November 23, 2016 at 11:57 am

    Take note – This is what monopoly supremacists mean by “terrorist” and the Military-Industrial-Complex convinces our government to war against. Think about it. This is the domestic version of our foreign aggression against other nations of people. And, the hired infiltrators and provocateurs of the corrupted police state become our “ISIS” gangs. Don’t let it happen anymore, here or abroad.

    • Patrick

      January 21, 2017 at 10:03 am

      Soros is no friend of POTUS 45.

  15. Earle L. Bailey

    November 23, 2016 at 3:40 pm

    Sorry, it wasn’t the Liberals who shït all over the Fourth Amendment. That was Bush the Usurper. The sooner We The People figure out that we’ve been sold out by BOTH the Liberal and Conservative Establishment, the sooner we can start trying to “fix” it.

    • LiveFree1200cc

      January 21, 2017 at 9:15 am

      BINGO !

    • Pete

      January 22, 2017 at 7:11 am

      The entire Bush family is nothing but Globalist trash. The Clintons are just a Democratic branch of the Bush dynasty. The same goes for the Obamas. That’s what most people in this country fail to see, and it’s exactly what the Globalist want. There are no more traditional republicans and democrats, they’ve been replaced mostly by bank and special interest owned globalist traitors. The politicians that are actually on the peoples side, are the ones that are laughed off, and dismissed by the MSM as tin hat politicians. Like Ron and Rand Paul, or any “blue dog” democrats. What we’re really up against, is Globalism, and it should be stopped in it’s tracks. It’s our duty as Americans, to put America first. Any other country should not be our concern.

  16. mutineer

    November 23, 2016 at 3:59 pm

    You idiot, Ericksen is not a U.S. Senator, he can’t introduce legislation to the US Congress. And you prattle on about the Constitution while talking about taking away people’s First Amendment rights? The right to protest is protected. That law would be completely unconstitutional.

    • J

      January 20, 2017 at 7:46 pm

      Screw you!!!!!!

      • Jake long

        January 22, 2017 at 7:04 am

        Hey Dana —it appears Richard is from the US as he knows that the Constitutation was established by the people of the states to form at Ubitied states. The people included in that Constitutin guartenees that our unalienable rights, as mentioned in the Declaration of Independence. that all humans are born with could not be violated by this new government.

    • J

      January 20, 2017 at 7:49 pm

      no it would not because although everyone has a right to peacefully protest no one has a right to start a fire hurt a cop or any other human on this planet,steal,loot, pillage burn,stop others from going about their business and terrorize people on the streets!

    • Sharon

      January 20, 2017 at 10:39 pm

      The right to protest yes but the right to destroy, attack and cause property as well as bodily harm to others… No!

    • tim roberts

      January 21, 2017 at 8:59 am

      when you start fires and beat people up and threaten murder it has gone beyond protesting. it has turned into rioting not protesting. and anyone involved , from the funders down to the actual perticipants should be charged with at least a class c felony. i would say a class b felony is more like it. either way , they will be branded the rest of their miserable lives with a felony on their record witch reduces their chance of getting a good job to next to nill. plus a fine and jail time. this is how we protest , not by maiming the public , injurying the police and burning and looting. go to jail.

    • Patrick

      January 21, 2017 at 10:04 am

      Rioting is NOT a right you child.

    • Joe cotillo

      January 21, 2017 at 10:24 am

      The Constitution does NOT give anyone the ‘right’ to protest! Amendment 1 of the Constitution gives : “the right of the people PEACEABLY to assemble,” Notice the word PEACEABLY . These pricks were in no way, doing any thing PEACEABLY!

    • Susu

      January 21, 2017 at 11:06 am

      The article is correct. Erickson is a state senator from Washington State, so if the bill passes, it would only affect Washington State.

    • Bethany Peoples

      January 21, 2017 at 12:16 pm

      The right to peaceful protest is protected no one has the right to insite riot. There is a difference and what these people are doing is not protest it is riot! Grow up!

    • Ralph Jones

      January 21, 2017 at 1:38 pm

      The right to protest is protected. The rioting and destruction of private property is criminal behavior. Thugs that engage in rioting should be beaten then locked up so they can pound away at the steel walls and bars.

    • Barbara Kingston

      January 21, 2017 at 2:32 pm

      There are laws already in place for these foolish dolts. Use them.

  17. Paul

    November 23, 2016 at 5:01 pm

    I agree something needs to be done but very careful writing of this bill must be done because we know when we give the federal government a inch they will take ten miles we need to make sure whats being in acted must not interfere with peaceful protest because i refuse to give up my right to protest. Be very very careful

    • LiveFree1200cc

      January 21, 2017 at 9:17 am

      This bill is unnecessary. We already have laws about vandalism and crime. Once you start breaking laws and damaging property, you are no longer merely protesting

  18. v goodwin

    November 23, 2016 at 9:04 pm

    Article [I] (Amendment 1 – Freedom of expression and religion) 13
    Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof; or abridging the freedom of speech, or of the press; or the right of the people peaceably to assemble, and to petition the Government for a redress of grievances.

    • Ellen

      January 20, 2017 at 6:31 pm

      one thing it states peaceful these idiots are not peaceful they destroy property does not matter whos they bat up voters, they stop traffic which could mean life are death to someone in an ambulance needing to get to the hospital fast. Hope they pass it and arrest all those violent protesters and vigilanties

      • LiveFree1200cc

        January 21, 2017 at 9:18 am

        Ellen – This bill is unnecessary. We already have laws about vandalism and crime. Once you start breaking laws and damaging property, you are no longer merely protesting

    • Jessie Smith

      January 20, 2017 at 8:11 pm

      These people weren’t peaceable and they were destroying private property and endangering others. They dress and act like terrorists. The old saying “if it walks like a duck, quacks like a duck…”

    • Patrick

      January 21, 2017 at 10:05 am

      Rioting is NoT free speech moron.

    • Ralph Jones

      January 21, 2017 at 1:41 pm

      There’s nothing “peaceable” about the liberal temper tantrums that have been occurring since President Trump won the election. The rioters are destroying private property and intimidating and assaulting people they THINK to be Trump supporters. I’ve tried to get them to assault me, but thus far I’ve had no takers. I guess liberals are cowardly criminals.

  19. Joe

    November 24, 2016 at 3:38 am

    Yes, it is very important that these protestors do not cause Martial Law to take place. This land is about Law and Order Plus, what I do not understand is it is illegal in most cities to have large gatherings, marches, protests unless you get a permit ahead and get approval. Seems like they go on protests with no approval. Plus, it is one thing to have a protest one day, but these crazies are doing it every day ,some all day. That is too much . Plus large groups can get out of hand. All it takes is one crazy leader to tell them to do some crazy harmful thing and group mentality can take over that is very dangerous where they do as a group what they would never do as individuals. I am so sick of hearing of the protests.

    • bill bailey

      January 21, 2017 at 2:24 pm

      it is illegal to have open fires — so burning any thing is in violation of most all legal authority

    • yokeddruid

      January 21, 2017 at 10:17 pm

      BS ! They would do it as an Individual if they could get away with it ! They just know that as a large group it’s easier to get away with it. Either that or you are saying those protesting are of such a low intellect that they can not think for themselves and that they have no self control and no moral compass whatsoever!

    • E A Kohl

      January 24, 2017 at 11:47 am

      “Yes, it is very important that these protestors do not cause Martial Law to take place”

      Yes, setting up the climate to militarize our police forces is very much a part of this process. They (those behind the scenes) very cleverly set up such situations that weaken us from both directions.

  20. Annette Ortiz

    November 24, 2016 at 9:23 am

    Liberals have a hard time being peaceful??? You must be on heroin. The way I see it, it’s the cops and government that are having the hard time being peaceful. Typical conservative BS.

    • J

      January 20, 2017 at 7:51 pm

      duh yes they are becasue THEY are the ones hurting burning lootin and throwing tantrums

      • cascadian12

        January 21, 2017 at 11:22 am

        They are not “Liberals.” The violent people in black call themselves “anarchists” and often show up at peaceful protests. We do not condone them and never have, but we don’t control them. They just show up. There are laws to deal with them and I fully support those laws. Most people taking the time to protest do not want to hurt anyone or damage anyone’s property. To tar all protesters with property destruction is like saying all conservatives are NAZI racist scum who want to create a police state to force their values down our throats.

    • Jessie Smith

      January 20, 2017 at 8:14 pm

      The police didn’t start smashing windows, flipping cars, throwing smoke bombs. They responded to these ISIS clad criminal terrorists. I saw it all live on the Communist News Network.

    • Patrick

      January 21, 2017 at 10:08 am

      Rioting is NoT free speech moron.your medication needs another dose. The Police should have kicked their butts not let them burn anything or throw a single rock. You are a fool to believe these terrorists are justified.

    • Barbara Kingston

      January 21, 2017 at 2:32 pm

      Are you living on Mars? Do you not watch the news?

  21. Dana allen

    November 24, 2016 at 10:05 am

    I cannot share your propaganda as us Liberals are in favor of citizens having guns to protect us from domestic terrorists who are trying to prevent free speech it is our first constitutional amendments and should never be touched just as the Second Amendment shouldn’t be either. To make free speech illegal is just insane and not what this country was founded on because Lord knows there’s a fine line in law enforcement does lie so now they have free rein to stop Whoever Whenever they feel like it based on their word real smart if you’re looking for that kind of America go somewhere else this country’s already been founded on moral principles that can’t be destroyed

    • Rex

      January 21, 2017 at 8:49 am

      Dana Allen, have you ever heard of a period or comma? That gibberish of yours was practically unintelligible, considering you used no punctuation.

    • Patrick

      January 21, 2017 at 10:11 am

      Rioting is not free speech but rioting IS terrorism. I welcome their just rewards. We need peace in our streets with peaceful protests. You pick up a Rick or touch anyone’s property and you gave up your right to vote RIGHT THEN. They will find out President Trump and VP Pence are men, not communist reformers like Obama.

    • Mary

      January 21, 2017 at 10:29 am

      We have freedom of speech and freedom to pay the fine and go to jail for disorderly conduct and vandalism as well as criminal damage to property and illegal entry.

    • yokeddruid

      January 21, 2017 at 10:09 pm

      There’s a difference between Free Speech and vandalism, destruction of property, assault, robbery, and false imprisonment(blocking highways and holding people against their will is false imprisonment) ! Your RIGHT TO FREE SPEECH ENDS when you START INFRINGING ON THE RIGHTS OF OTHERS. Others have JUST AS MUCH RIGHT AS YOU DO!

    • Jake long

      January 22, 2017 at 7:19 am

      There is no protection of any right to riot, burn, shutdown or destroy to protest. The Constitution protects the right to peaceable assembly, the right to petition your representatives your grievances as well as numerous other Rughts in he bill of rights. The right to have organized attempts to upsurpt the Constitutional Government thru violence and acts of intimidation to individuals or lawful activities is an insurrection. This is clearly a violation of the Constitution Law and the Constitution allows the Government to put down those insurrection with force. People taking part in an organized effort to disrupt lawful activities such as the Inaguration through violence and restriction of the freedom of other citizens to lawfully assembly through resistance to law enforcement , intimidation of others and destruction of property are not Protestors they are insurrectionist so and the Constitution require the Government to put them down by for if necessary. This is in there folks— the media and the rioters should take heed. The Americsn people are tired of this bull.

  22. Nelson Robison

    November 24, 2016 at 2:41 pm

    This nation was founded by men who gave their lives for the right to protest and make sure that the government heard their voices. Now the fascist minded Christian Party has decided that protesting governmental policies, both foreign and domestic, is not only a felony but is economic terrorism. An even further example of the lengths to which the Christians will go is that they are committed to making slaves of the populace, forcing their religion on those who neither want nor need the belief in their invisible deity as part of their lives.

    • Ralph Jones

      January 21, 2017 at 1:44 pm

      What about destruction of private parties do you morons not understand? It’s illegal. It’s always been illegal. You libtards are carrying it out on a grand scale by rioting, not protesting.

    • Liz

      January 21, 2017 at 8:46 pm

      You need to reread the article. The way I understood it was that if you want to protest do so peacefully, don’t destroy property or attack people and yes that even means police. Also how did Christians get blamed no one said anything about them and yet you jumped to the conclusion that they must be responsible.

    • TheBeez

      January 21, 2017 at 11:23 pm

      I’m a Christian and I don’t force my beliefs on any one. No one is talking about taking away any rights guaranteed in the Constitution, we need people who cause violence and property damage to be held accountable for their actions. Your rights and beliefs don’t over rule mine. This political correctness has to go away.
      You say something that’s your right freedom of speech, but if I say something and you don’t like what I have to say, you get offended now you don’t believe in my freedom of speech this is the liberal view on freedom of speech.

    • Dians

      January 23, 2017 at 10:54 pm

      Did you not read and understand what was written? Protesting will still happen but when destruction of property happens then it is a riot and they will arrest! Do you understand the difference? Protesting is peaceful walking on the sidewalks, not impeding traffic or blocking others from going to their destinations. Rioting is damaging property of others! Breaking windows, lighting fires, fighting, knifing, shootings! Understand the difference now?

  23. Alistair

    November 24, 2016 at 4:17 pm

    Because only liberals do this kind of thing right. It’s not like conservative filth EVER did this EVER. Oh wait. They did… a lot and it was far worse. First Amendment is absolute on this issue. You can’t do anything.

    • Ralph Jones

      January 21, 2017 at 1:49 pm

      Once again that’s bullshit. You can’t yell “Fire!” in a crowded theater unless there is a fire, and you cannot incite, or participate in a riot where property destruction and assaults take place. Nor can you encourage or incite seditious behavior. None of the BOR’s is absolute. They are all held to a reasonable standard. Yes, that’s correct, you do NOT have the absolute right to say what’s on your little libtard minds. Ya’ll need to take a criminology course.

      • Caro

        February 2, 2017 at 7:19 pm

        Oh my! It appears that you need to talk to Donald Trump then who continues to incite seditious behaviour. This article is the worst twisting of logic I’ve ever read.

    • yokeddruid

      January 21, 2017 at 10:12 pm

      REALLY ?? WHEN?

    • D.South

      January 22, 2017 at 4:38 am

      Screw you yahoo. Yuo cant damage property, and endanger lives. You liberal Sshole crybabys eat shit. Or youll get gassed ha ha ha ha

    • LOL progs

      January 22, 2017 at 4:30 pm

      Great. When a protest destroys your stuff and harms you you’ll celebrate that eh Proggy?

  24. Ian Napp

    November 24, 2016 at 7:24 pm

    how can they just change the law overnight obamma wat a dirty bastard


    January 20, 2017 at 5:45 am

    One correction concerning your article Red Rock News, our rights are not given to us by the Constitution, our rights are given to us by our Almighty God. They are unallienable, meaning we cant give them away nor can they be be taken away rightfully, by government nor an individual. Think about that and let it sink in.

    • LiveFree1200cc

      January 21, 2017 at 9:20 am

      Exactly, our rights are inherent for being born human. The constitution is a list of things the government can NOT do, it is not a list of ‘rights’

    • Barbara Kingston

      January 21, 2017 at 2:33 pm

      Do you believe in GOD?

  26. Ted

    January 20, 2017 at 8:45 am

    You @ss wipe!! If this is what you wish for.. YOU ARE A TRAITOR OUR FLAG, OUR COUNTRY, OUR CONSTITUTION. If you get what you are asking for, I say we will inundate you with so called “TERRORISM” and pack the courts and jails with massive protest. The majority will show you that we will not stand for your hatred and bigotry.. Piece of $hit!

    • Ralph Jones

      January 21, 2017 at 1:51 pm

      Hey Ted, better switch to decaff, Trump will be there for 8 years. We had to put up wit Barry for 8 years, and not ONE riot occurred. Imagine that.

  27. roy

    January 20, 2017 at 9:06 am

    I just like to let all of know, you have the right the freedom to protest but if you keep on beating up on people burning down a business because you had the right to protest, just to wake your ass up, that is when you or breaking the law, and if you have to right to beat up on people I have to right to beat up your damn ass and fight back so the next time you think just because you have the right to protest you better hope and pray that it is not me you want to beat up on because I will fight back. and just maybe I”LL Have gun

    • LiveFree1200cc

      January 21, 2017 at 9:21 am


  28. linda woodcock

    January 20, 2017 at 2:44 pm

    These “snowflakes” and “punks” are not using the 1st amendment. They are destroying other people’s property. That goes far beyond any amendment we have. It is time they were held responsible. They know they are doing something illegal. Why else would they be hiding their faces. These are corrupt men and women, old enough to vote, than they are old enough to take the time for the crime. They are the one’s setting the margin. I don’t care how old my son or daughter was if you are there and you get caught, don’t call me to come bail you out. And the parents of these kids need to start doing the same thing.

    • Bethany Peoples

      January 21, 2017 at 12:22 pm

      I whole heartedly agree with you! You do the crime you do the time! These people are rioting in the streets of our great nation they are not protesting.

    • EJ

      January 22, 2017 at 2:19 am

      Fuck you bitch! Funny thing about snowflakes, put enough together and you get an avalanche! We will bury you right wing maggots!

  29. Stu

    January 20, 2017 at 7:39 pm

    Just enforce anti rioting laws.

    • LiveFree1200cc

      January 21, 2017 at 9:23 am

      Exactly, just enforce regular laws. You do not have a right to hurt people or damage their property. We dont need new laws to say what our current laws already say

  30. J. Robert Reiskamp. P.O. Box 1057, Psage Beach , Mo 65065

    January 20, 2017 at 9:15 pm

    Great informative – truthful News

  31. Howard T. Lewis III

    January 20, 2017 at 11:39 pm

    Bad law. The laws are already on the books for property destruction and impeding traffic and impeding people going on about their business. BAD LAW!!! Sounds like Skelator Chertoff risen from the dead. No good, bad law.

    • LiveFree1200cc

      January 21, 2017 at 9:23 am

      Bingo – Its a Redundant and dangerous law

    • mafiasword

      January 21, 2017 at 3:34 pm

      so you encourage the destruction of government properties and people things and hurting the police officers. Is that what you like that they should go scornfully free,no that can’t happen

    • Tj

      January 22, 2017 at 2:13 pm

      The problem is current law requires that the individual committing the crime must be caught in the act making it difficult at best for police to apprehend. This new law will allow police to apprehend protesters who shelter those committing the crimes.

  32. Michael Tiffany

    January 21, 2017 at 1:25 am

    I just love these consecutive news sites that turn everything around backwards to fit their propaganda agenda. Liberals don’t want to take away your constitutional rights that is the work of the conservtards trying to limit your freedom of speech this law proves it, because 99% of the protestors were peaceful. Liberals don’t want global business practices that is sociopathic conservtard business people that want to enslave the working class, and destroy union representation. You call liberals snowflakes well how about all those conservtard snowflakes that whined, cried, bitched, and moaned for eight years about a black President. Don’t worry little conservtard snowflakes your lord and saviour stumpy boy will sell you down the river too you are not going to be able to find a safe place from the billionaire that will sell you into slavery, and when your Republican Gods make you homeless don’t come crying to me.

  33. Frank Stein

    January 21, 2017 at 1:41 am

    Wow, ok. So you are exercising a typical libturd strategy called “projection”, which occurs when one is guilty of something but in order to deflect attention, accuses another of the crime which he committed. Examples of liberal projection. Democrats voted against every civil rights bill yet they refer to Conservatives as racists. The vast majority of firearm homicides are committed by Democrats in 6 cities, yet Democrats accuse Conservatives of being violent. Harry Belfonte Jr said that all who don’t agree with Obama should go to reeducation camps, yet Conservatives are called fascists. Hillary and Obama said that Fox news and Conservative radio stations should be put off the air for spreading racist hatred, yet CNN. MsNBC and other liberal stations edit video and audio clips to make whites look racist, and employ individuals who actively call for the slaughter of whites. Democrats accuse Conservatives of suppressing votes, yet Conservatives were arrested for wearing shirts that said Make America Great again, while libturds literally had Sanders and Clinton t-shirts in the same line.

  34. steve

    January 21, 2017 at 4:11 am

    Fake news. Unsubscribe me. Don’t send me any more of this dribble.

  35. BillWhit

    January 21, 2017 at 6:55 am

    If true, then I would certainly support this Law 100%! Time for these Snowflake Crybabies to change their diapers and act like adults, otherwise, they will be made to regret rioting and destroying by being charged with terrorism, as domestic enemies of our nation, which every Vet, like myself, have sworn to protect our nation against. Any arrested should lose all welfare or whatever benefits they are sucking off the backs of working Patriots, and most of these Leftist Snowflakes are on some kind of Freebies from the taxpayer, because most are too lazy to work an actual job. Going to be hilarious listening to them whine, lol!

  36. Dennis Wall

    January 21, 2017 at 6:55 am

    FINALLY! This got started with the Negroes & now the Whites have joined in on the destruction! This is obviously Domestic Terrorism. Obama & Sharpton realky, “lit the fire”, so’s to speak, on this kind of UN-American Lawlessness! Unless they Repent they will burn in Hell!
    The punishment should be a $10,000 fine plus 5 years in prison!

  37. Crpoppler

    January 21, 2017 at 7:10 am

    That will work after Barack let all the drug dealers out of prison there’s plenty of room

  38. Richard

    January 21, 2017 at 8:15 am

    This article is bonkers.
    I dont believe you believe any of it, its too mad.

  39. Tammy

    January 21, 2017 at 8:43 am

    If TRUE…..Aren’t there already laws against rioting? I’ll bet there are…then enforce them. We’ve had a justice system that has chosen not to enforce laws. One thing we don’t need is another law.

  40. me

    January 21, 2017 at 9:06 am

    This is total bs.
    “fake news”

  41. Billy Bob

    January 21, 2017 at 9:30 am

    Obviously the author doesn’t know the difference between peaceful protesting….legal….and rioting with property destruction.. I’ve long felt that rioters and looters should be rdquired to make restitution.

  42. anon

    January 21, 2017 at 9:38 am

    “You have rights that are given to you from the Constitution” WRONG! The Constitution AFFIRMS the rights we’ve already been given as human beings by God! The Constitution ‘gives’ us nothing. Why is the 2nd Amendment there? To protect those rights!
    Aside from that, you can protest or sit in a corner and cry all you want, however! The split second you raise your hand to strike or destroy, you are no longer protesting. You then become a terrorist or vandal. Laws are already there for either, just enforce the damn laws! With the firing of Loretta Lynch, President Trump is on the right path.

  43. Bob Hucik

    January 21, 2017 at 10:18 am

    The anti rioting laws that exist need a reinforcing amendment added to them. This new law not only holds the rioter responsible, but, also, the one who has put them up to do the destruction in the name of a protest. In the past people would riot because of their own persuasion, however, in today’s society, there are professional rioters, those who get paid to destroy property, within the ranks of today’s more recent protests, and have confessed to that. This law will bring to justice the one’s responsible for sending these paid rioters into an otherwise peaceful protest. How does one rationalize that these types of laws infringe on the first amendment? Their thinking is a bit twisted to think that anyone has the right to destroy personal property.

  44. Ketsy Lynn Nelson

    January 21, 2017 at 10:19 am

    I have got your back. Should need me just reach out a hand I will take it. If you need me to stand up for you I am already on my feet just tell were you need me to stand. If you cannot stand lean on me I am strong. If you cannot walk I will carry you or if need be push your wheel chair. If you need me to take down some walls I just need to run to the store and get some supplies.

  45. Dale

    January 21, 2017 at 10:58 am

    NO but he is a SENATOR from the State of Washington & the BILL is being passed in THAT STATE

  46. Glenn

    January 21, 2017 at 11:01 am

    Free speech, burning a Flag isn’t speech it’s Arson, Protests are legal until you start burning crap and destroying property and blocking roadways and beating people up because of who they voted for, Now it’s our turn Demoidiots, Puf the military on the border and build that BIG Beautiful wall, if you are caught smuggling drugs just hang the trash and they won’t be a repeat offender, disarm all government agencies and sell those 2 Billion rounds of Ammo to the public, Open Carry should be legal Nation Wide, A woman’s right to choose is nothing but Legal Murder cause a woman already has a right to choose, What about All the young baby women who are aborted every day, Did they have a right to choose, Ho to Iran or Saudi Arabia and carry you women’s lib signs and see what happens, won’t be seeing you around here anymore, Freedom of Religon, it means that the USA Government can’t impose a Religion on the American People, Islam is NOT a Religion, They worship a dead man who’s never coming back and he’s not a God, You can ban a group of people , the Democrats have done it, We don’t have an American problem we have a God problem, We are turning into Sadom and Gamora, What’s bad we say is good and what’s good we say is bad, You don’t like my free speach, don’t ask me what I think of Gays or Lesbians, Gay means I’m happy and that closet door is still shut, I know, some of you will not like what I have to say and will get offended, Get over it, I don’t like what you stand for but the Constitution and the Bill of Rights gives both of us the Right to vent and Bitch now don’t it.


    January 21, 2017 at 11:05 am

    The right to peaceful protest coincides with the 1st Amendment BUT when the peaceful dissent digresses into violence against others, including police officers, and property damages by fire and looting then the 1st Amendment right should be thrown out the window. A society will remain stable as long as the people abide by the rules coexistence. When the stability starts to erode from internal chaos then the government has a RIGHT to step in and quell the disturbance or Uprising.

  48. Joe

    January 21, 2017 at 11:06 am

    This writer stinks , what a asshole !

  49. cascadian12

    January 21, 2017 at 11:07 am

    I know you guys only pay attention to the Second Amendment of the Bill of rights, but you might want to brush up on the First:

    “Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof; or abridging the freedom of speech, or of the press; OR THE RIGHT OF THE PEOPLE PEACEABLY TO ASSEMBLE, AND TO PETITION THE GOVERNMENT FOR A REDRESS OF GRIEVANCES.” [emphasis added]

    You accuse liberals of wanting to destroy the Constitution when we are exercising our Constitutional rights of speech, peaceful protest, and petitioning the government! Back to school for you! BTW, the “Anarchists” who vandalize and destroy property are never condoned by protest organizers, but show up anyway. We do not control them. And, as others have said, there are already laws to deal with such destruction.

  50. Mark

    January 21, 2017 at 12:46 pm

    A most disturbing law on so many levels. Don’t mask such an anti-Constitutional law as beneficial. If such a law were passed the Liberals would be right in labeling our new administration as Nazi. Imagine a gun law where the maker of a firearm is responsible for the conduct of the individual owner. As always we should enforce the laws we presently have.

  51. Valerie

    January 21, 2017 at 12:47 pm

    God Bless America, God Bless President Donald Trump.

  52. Trina

    January 21, 2017 at 12:49 pm

    To whomever wrote this article, and their editor, The headline on this article is misleading. The bill only addresses those people who do damage, and/ or harm. It needs to be changed, or you will become part of the fake media!

  53. Bill Burnett

    January 21, 2017 at 12:55 pm

    Check North Carolina GS 14-288.2 Riot, Inciting to Riot and Punishments.

  54. Steve D

    January 21, 2017 at 12:55 pm

    This is bullshit, and literally an attack on free speech!

    Laws already exist for people who commit crimes, this is written in such a way that they can stop any protest peaceful or not. Who ever authored this needs to loose their job and be replaced with someone who actually understands the constitution!

  55. scott

    January 21, 2017 at 2:14 pm

    First of all, it would be entirely within our Consitutional rights to protest Trumps’ election, it that’s what we were doing.

    But the bigger point is that I and a half-million others are not in DC right now to protest that Trump was elected. We are protesting his policies; in particular racist and sexist policies. We are making the point in this particular rally that his ideas about women’s rights are unacceptable. The rallies here were all about human rights and healthcare, not about the unfairness of the Electoral College or Comey’s interference in the election. And if they were, how would that be bad? Saying we can’t assemble to let the administration know how we feel about how they have said they planned to proceed on policiy issues is a a violation of our rights.

    I remember Tea Partiers protesting healthcare reform, the TARP bailouts, and income tax. No liberals said they didn’t have the right to do that.

  56. bill bailey

    January 21, 2017 at 2:22 pm

    reinact the draft and put all of them in old fashion boot camp then put them on the front lines to stop bullets and see if they are as tough as the think they are

  57. Carol Newby

    January 21, 2017 at 3:30 pm

    No protester has the right to vandalize private properties and business! That is not the way to make a point by destroying and looting and hurting other people! Go after the ring leaders behind this first by following the paper trail. Then arrest the ones responsible for the damage and hold them accountable for destruction of property and make them either pay restitution for damages made or let them sit it out in jail or doing community work to equal the amount of damages they done! This has to stop! This is not a third world country like some of these whinny babies think it is!!!!

  58. gp

    January 21, 2017 at 3:32 pm

    this is one of them fake news russian sites, isn’t it.

  59. geary

    January 21, 2017 at 3:51 pm

    fake news. no republican could withstand denying the right to protest. if they (protesters) break an existing legitimate law–and they certainly do- then they should be arrested. as a republican, I want to be able to protest without being charged. I don’t even want to be able to commit the same crimes that the democrats are committing without being charged with the respective crime. democrats are idiots enough without having to make this crap up. speak truth. that is after all the only thing that separates us from them.

  60. Puddin' Tane

    January 21, 2017 at 4:00 pm

    Increase the penalty to 10 years hard labor breaking boulders into gravel for use as aggregate in the border WALL and after their sentence is done, put them on the other side of that wall (exile them). If you think I’m too harsh, let me say that if it was up to me, I’d just shoot them and be done with it – we have a country to rebuild and don’t have time for BULLSH!T like this.

  61. Michael Laborde

    January 21, 2017 at 4:21 pm

    The constitution does not give anyone the right to destroy private or public property, attack people or the police or rob / steal from anyone as a protester. And then there is the seditions act which calls anyone who pays anyone to protest and those protesters turn into savage beast and riot, steal, attack people or police, destroy private or public property, etc.

  62. Stacy Aaron

    January 21, 2017 at 4:40 pm

    Sad when a journalist is too stupid to know that they are talking about rioting, not protests. Let me educate you, stupid… Protests are peaceful, riots destroy shit.

  63. Or when teams win the Super Bowl many times crowds are known to run amok and cause damage to probably property

    January 21, 2017 at 4:51 pm

    And what happens if you just protesting ? With out Violence I mean I’ve seen college parties were drunks will turn over cars and set Fire to trush bins , so that would be OK will the also be given jail time and a fine? Or when teams win the Super Bowl many times crowds are known to run amok and cause damage to public property will they also be receiving jail time ? And what about a landowner protesting government seizing of his his property by protesting would they be considered economic terrorist ?

    • Or when teams win the Super Bowl many times crowds are known to run amok and cause damage to probably property

      January 21, 2017 at 5:08 pm

      Why is my “comment awaiting moderation” I i’ve never heard of such a thing before . Are comments only excepted’s only if they agree with your article ? And who is moderating my comments ? And, what do you base your moderations on? I hope it’s not spelling, I am a terrible speller . And how do you pick your panel of moderators do you hold an election ? Or is it the language you are moderating, And And would you define this site is open to opinions or a site that filters out opposing opinions ? Or is that distinction have yet to be moderated ? Thank you for your time in answering these questions . Have a good day.

  64. rickmt

    January 21, 2017 at 5:37 pm

    The Clinton’s and Obama have one Bible: Saul Alinsky’s “Rules for Radicals”. Disarming the public, is a priority.

  65. MAX

    January 21, 2017 at 6:08 pm

    that girl in the picture , honey first just so you dont bite they’re going to knock out all your teeth , then introduce you to big betty and the broom stick , and thats only over the weekend ENJOY

  66. Joe everybody

    January 21, 2017 at 6:12 pm

    Fix your headline, the law that is being proposed is for those who riot not protest. Big difference

  67. Mike

    January 21, 2017 at 7:00 pm

    This headline is a total click bait lie. There is nothing in this law that arrests ALL protesters, it’s a law against funding protests. This website is garbage and reading it is only going to make you angry and dumb.

  68. dail grainger

    January 21, 2017 at 7:20 pm

    i agree 100% these idiots need to be in jail, and the idiot that said we dont get our rights from the constitution needs to read it .

  69. Grannington

    January 21, 2017 at 7:24 pm

    Which amendment gives one the right to destroy property and burn police vehicles, impede traffic, assault
    police officers and others at will?

  70. brett

    January 21, 2017 at 7:32 pm

    “Despite the fact that the United States was founded with the Constitution being the document that gives people power” Now the constitution is the document giving power from the people to the government with limitations. I am not sure where you learned differently.

  71. Barb

    January 21, 2017 at 8:57 pm

    I believe in the freedom of speech and also believe people have a right to a peaceful assembly. the people who are rioting in the streets hurting people looting and burning buildings to me they are home gown terrorists and should be dealt with as such. For the people who are protesting for what they think is right should really be upset and mad as hell because these rioters are stepping on their rights to have a peaceful protest and could wind up in jail for just being there. some of these people who are out there are out there for one reason and one reason only to destroy hurt and loot what ever they can. If I get mad at someone and go break their car window just because they don’t believe the way I do chances are my butt is going to jail and rightfully so that is why we have laws without them we will be in a downward spiral as a civilized world. I am for any law that will bring this to a stop it has to stop one way or another.

  72. Michael Finnell

    January 21, 2017 at 9:23 pm

    Enough is enough.
    Run their asses over.
    Stand in the way of MY SUV and I am running you over and if I have time to stop to get your wallet and cell phone to inform your family you are a fucking idiot I will.
    I will not even get a parking ticket.
    Keep it up snowflakes.
    100 million of you are about to expire.

  73. lisa chamblee

    January 21, 2017 at 9:54 pm

    Love the writing

    I agree, we need freedom to reign supreme again

  74. Tawny Y.

    January 21, 2017 at 9:57 pm

    What a load of crap. Those supposed 3 million illegal votes were wholly invented by a recent college grad who wanted to drive traffic to his fake news web site to generate ad revenue…and you conservatives bought it hook, line, and sinker and paid off his college loans for him…and most of y’all don’t even know you got played and still believe that fake news was true.
    And nobody’s worried about calling protests “economic terrorism” because the very first person who gets attested for peacefully demonstrating will take it to the Supreme Court and it will get struck down for violating the Constitution.

  75. Wayne Miller

    January 21, 2017 at 10:25 pm

    That is absolute garbage!! Since when does god give out orders to who should or who shouldn’t! It’s high time many of you start taking god out of the equation, and start to come back to reality on earth!!

    • The WiZaRd

      January 22, 2017 at 5:55 am


  76. Susan

    January 21, 2017 at 10:46 pm

    Just a reminder…with that in place, Clinton’s and Obamas aren’t above the law…what will happen to them ? They DO need to be accountable!

  77. Bill

    January 21, 2017 at 10:54 pm

    What a violent, vicious piece of false news. BOYCOTT THE DEPLORABLES!

  78. Virginia Heether

    January 21, 2017 at 11:31 pm

    For anyone who HASN’T read the Constitution and Bill of Rights The 1st AMMENDMENT says you have the right to PEACEFULLY ASSEMBLE. No Where does it say you can RIOT, to distory property or Injure another person. That’s NOT a right. This Bill will help in Stopping this nonsense. But as I’ve read there are BILLS on the books that need to be Enforced. The last 20/30 years NO ONE has enforce them.
    As far as what the consequences are for the Rioters that part of the bill should be the minimum. But for the Rich Ass Liberals it should be double the cost of per protester including jail time. No exemption, NO appeals

  79. G Berry

    January 21, 2017 at 11:42 pm


  80. Mckenzie Scott

    January 22, 2017 at 12:31 am

    sounds like it’s all based on option to me. And it all goes down hill from here. Just wait I know it will get worse, just a fair warning, but I also could be wrong. This is what I call a dystopia effect. When some one else’s perfect world is defferent than some one else’s, and becomes greedy to want more power and to be in control. When some one tells the truth and has solid proof they get shut down because that individual becomes a threat to them because they are more uncontrole to them in that moment to they want to eliminate our control the best way we can without any physical harm.
    And I feel as though this might happen quickly.

  81. Chris Stowell

    January 22, 2017 at 3:25 am

    You must be one stupid mother fucking Nazi dumbshit who has never read the ACTUAL text of the Constitution. With your Anti-Individual liberties and making up shit about ILLEGAL votes when the only cases so far of Election Fraud were Republicans in rural counties in Wisconsin and Michigan and Pennsylvania. You are seriously stupid. Protest is what this country is founded on. The MAJORITY do NOT support your Trump ass and They are being denied their Representation the Founders fought and died for. Congratu-fucking-lations you are dumb as fuck. Protesting is not Terrorism. Pansy ass Conservatives…

  82. Billy Angus

    January 22, 2017 at 5:54 am




  83. The WiZaRd

    January 22, 2017 at 6:02 am





  84. Word

    January 22, 2017 at 8:46 am

    you need to change the title. You didn’t think that through very good. The title implies that just protesting peacefully would be illegal. That is the last thing you want to be saying. The Constitution guarantees us the right to protest. The title should be more specific to violent, damaging protests. Not all protests.

  85. Zomack

    January 22, 2017 at 8:54 am

    Its sad you say you wanna protect our right and take away our rights at the sametime but then you say its liberals ! LmAO ! GET A CLUE PLEASE ! No liberal ever said they wanted to take all of our guns that has been propaganda from Republicans . Nor support radical islam again Republicans selling weapons to Iran (Regan to be exact ) taking away our rights ? Yes that would be Republicans again Regan not Obam limiting guns in California yes actually passed laws . Getting rid of our healthcare we pay for yes Republicans getting rid womans services , takimg and spending our medicare money and never paying it back yes Republicans Bush to be exact !

  86. Heather Prudence Davis

    January 22, 2017 at 9:35 am

    Ok FIRST OF ALL, when I clicked the link to leave this reply, ya’ll gave me a damn virus, so that’s NOT COOL. And it’s most of the ALL REPUBLICAN CONGRESS THAT SHOULD BE IMPRISONED. Along WITH our RAPIST POTUS.

  87. Tj

    January 22, 2017 at 2:05 pm

    Nelson, be a godless pig if you want, scream and yell if you want, but if you damage my property or try to harm my family you go to jail or if I catch you first you get lead poisoning

  88. damian tempest

    January 22, 2017 at 2:20 pm

    Snowflakes….are unique…one of a kind…not a part of the collective…..there it is NOT an insult calling them, who dare to disagree a snowflake…it is technically a compliment…and this idiot lawmaker will never get it passed…..protesting…peacefully is constitutionally protected….nothing will change that…and this “lawmaker” on election day..will be unemployed and forgotten

  89. george ennis

    January 22, 2017 at 2:42 pm

    it used to be that you needed a permit to gather and protest, but peacefully. now it seems that there is no such thing as a peaceful protest, it is a mayhem of rioting, property damage and even bodily injury. interesting enough the women that protested, what exactly were they protesting? was it something trump said years ago? why didnt they protest when the president clinton was having sex with women and underage girls while he was president?
    a law that makes it a felony to protest would be unconstitutional, but a law making it a felony to riot, do property damage and bodily harm to others would not. it is called domestic terrorism. when people threaten others with harm it should be a felony and in the case of madonna, and all others that have threatened the life of now president trump, those should also be felonies and the person who threatened violence should be arrested and jailed as well as everyone that supports them.

  90. Charles Wells

    January 22, 2017 at 2:59 pm

    GOD OWNS ALL SOULS WAYNE MILLER,MAYBE YOU SHOULD PUT God in your equation and stop winning about everything,you need to grow ,maybe pull up your pants and become responsible, first get rid of your negative attitude and ask for forgiveness from your maker.

  91. Pam Devendorf

    January 22, 2017 at 4:46 pm

    IMO, Trump only RAN on the republican ticket, its closest to the mindset, but like myself I feel a LOT of us are simply FED UP with party politics and want to enjoy our framers intended way of life PERIOD. I don’t read that peaceful protesters will be arrested, only Harmful and Destructive ones. I’m thinking that this makes perfect sense. Nobody has the right to infringe on MY rights and when they do, THATS a crime. Too many people not able to read and digest whats written but instead just ASSUME their is a “hidden BAD agenda” because the never trumpers told them so. I also think the unplanned press snipet was SPOT ON, told us what President Trump is working on and put the LYING ABUSIVE MEDIA on an accountability status…..well its about Damned time! Journalism — USED to be an important and respected facet of our Great Nation, but now that its OWNED by media matters and THEY ARE OWNED by Big Crooked Bankers & Cartels we get GROSS MISREPRESENTATION of anything newsworthy and at times reports that ARE IMPORTANT never get the light of day shed on them ……ESPECIALLY if the information has any problematic fact about anyone the crooks support. In short, yes….go ahead and make these violent protesters do time, make them give the money Soros supplied to a special fund of some helpful kind! So Happy ☺ this insanity is beginning to be brought to an end. Fuk party politics, lets just get real and live by our Bill of Rights & bring our Constitutional Republic BACK! Enough is enough! Jus sayin’…..

  92. Sonya King

    January 22, 2017 at 4:54 pm

    The same argument for gun control can be applied here. This is the first step to preventing groups of people from gathering. Protests are always going to attract people looking to incite violence and whats to stop anyone from throwing a few rabble rousers into any situation they wish to disrupt. Yes! Everyone caught destroying property, causing bodily harm and inciting riots should be dealt with extra harshly in these situations and I believe we have laws for that. (What? Rioting is legal?) Most, if not all organizers stress non-violence and really just want to make their voices heard. They cannot be held responsible for every moron who sees their cause as a platform for mayhem, and we have already seen how easily opposition can turn things ugly. No protests will be allowed. Just like we can’t control who will cause mayhem with a gun, we cannot control who is joining a peaceful protest to cause mischief. We have the laws already. Why they are so hard to enforce when everything is videotaped and witnessed by hundreds is beyond me. ( Immigration! We have laws and nobody enforces any of them.) This is just a huge waste of time and is a blatant attempt to stifle any protesting .

  93. Maynard Hyler

    January 22, 2017 at 6:58 pm

    This “news” report (I used that term lightly) is absurd. The First Amendment gives/protects the right of free speech. To make free speech a crime is a violation of Constitutional Law. “Conservatives” are a clear and present danger to the Constitutional Rights of individuals in this nation. Don’t be fooled by titles assigned to individuals or groups such as liberal or conservative. This congressman is a nut!

  94. Lee Kirkland

    January 22, 2017 at 7:03 pm

    Sorry, you will not make me believe you are a Republican. You might be a RINO, but anyone
    Who shares your beliefs is no Conservative.

  95. Ray

    January 22, 2017 at 7:17 pm

    This will make protesting illegal. Any protest could cause someone to not buy a Twinkie. – also a law in the works allow police to break up protests by any means necessary, otherwise murder.

    United Fascists corporations of america.

  96. Nunya

    January 22, 2017 at 7:31 pm

    Name your sources for this article. This is a piece of trash reporting. Nothing but opinion. Links to bill? Links to news reports? This fake news is dangerous.

  97. Dianne

    January 22, 2017 at 8:06 pm

    We have the right to peaceful protest. Operative word is peaceful. You do NOT have the right to engage in acts of intimidation, acts of vandalism, or acts of physical violence. If you are engaging in any of those, you should be arrested-period! It’s called obeying the law-a novel concept for many liberals, but still must be done.

  98. Dianne

    January 22, 2017 at 8:11 pm

    You cannot vandalize property or harm people in your protest. Why is that so hard for you to grasp? You are also prohibited from blocking roadways and bridges, impeding emergency vehicles. The right to protest peacefully in NOT a license to do any damn thing you want.

  99. anon

    January 22, 2017 at 8:17 pm

    You have to read between the lines on the law in that article it is wide open for police and court abuse there is already law covering damaging another man’s person or property. That’s really bad news. There are other reasonable ways to deal with these liberal snowflakes without it having an impact on the rest of sensible protesting, whoever is proposing that garbage bill is a sociopath, an undercover terriost

  100. Me

    January 22, 2017 at 8:54 pm

    This is utter TRASH!

  101. Angel

    January 23, 2017 at 2:56 am

    First of all. No, the protestors actually care about Americans constitutional rights. Who the fuck made this stupid article. And what the fuck. No, he did not win fairly. The election was rigged. Everyone fucking knows that already. Plus more people voted for Hilary than Trump. The electoral college is the reason his bitch ass won. Lie to me again. This article is so pathetic

  102. Go fuck yourself

    January 23, 2017 at 3:24 am

    “Yes they were protesting the results of a FAIR election, despite the fact that there was still three million illegal votes cast.”

    In one single sentence you completely discredit yourself. Jesus tap dancing Christ, what is it with you dipshits? You think a conman who fucks over his employees and his contractors on a regular basis is suddenly going to be your leader? A fucking pedophile and rapist? You morons can’t be so desperate for a republican that you’re willing to take THIS piece of shit? Other REPUBLICANS can’t stand him but to get on his good side they’re willing to suck his dick for a job. You just did it for free.

    What is it about republicans you seem to love so much? Are the abortions the thing that fires you up so much? Yeah, you’re angry about abortions but aren’t willing to take care of the kids that are born? Fucking hypocrites. Think gun control means they’re coming for your guns? No, you stupid goddam dipshits: nobody’s coming to take your guns. You hate the affordable care act? Ok, what exactly do you hate about it so much? What was so great before that you fucking loved? The pre-existing conditions that could exclude you? The rising costs with few to nobody to stand in their way? You’re right, it was so fucking great that getting sick means it likely will bankrupt a family.

    God damn you morons. You’re gleefully inviting the end of country just so you can feel superior to the lower classes.

  103. Chuck

    January 23, 2017 at 6:05 am

    What a piece of crap rag this is!

  104. alejandro

    January 23, 2017 at 8:22 am

    yeah sure, those liberals rioting…but what about also those assholes that many many many of them are conservatives that go to a football game and after they break shit for fun…hey at least the liberals they do it from political reason…I don’t agree with that, but at least it has more reason than just breaking shit for fun….

  105. ACEnBEAKY

    January 23, 2017 at 11:09 am

    I know a lot of people on here don’t sympathize with protesters, or at least not how and why they’re protesting. And maybe I understand.
    But I also understand that, even from a non liberal POV, the American Colonies rebelled against their government for less. America has become the next Great Britain.
    Like in the colonial times, it was easy for the citizens of Britain to look down on colonists for being “uppity”, but the Brits in the homeland actually got more rights and freedoms. The colonists were treated like 2nd class citizens in a police state under Imperial Military occupation of their own homeland. I mean, fuck, Trump was implying open rebellion was an option on the table if he lost, cuz the elections might be “rigged” and believe it or not, Conservatives have been known to protest with threats. Conservatives tend not to attack by smashing property or tipping cars. But they still do things like burn black churches and assassinate, or threaten rape and murder to people, as has happened due to Trump coming to office.
    I don’t blame Trump. Almost voted for him, mainly not to go to war with Russia and Hillary has actually killed way more people than him. I could see him working out as an Andrew Jackson, best case scenario. Worst before it gets better. Perhaps a borderline psuedo dictator that “kills the bank” and gets us off of our allies that parasite us. He’s already blasted down TPP, which was something both cons and libs were worried about.
    But as I blasted the left for being politically correct under Obama, I already have to blast the right for something similar. Where as the left has zero tolerance for what it perceives as racism, even attacking it where it doesn’t exist, it acts like it’s not above it itself..and we know the left can be bigoted.
    So, I have a similar problem with another hypocrisy the right tends to have, the so called small government cons that are actually quite authoritarian. They have lost their spirit of revolution that this country was founded upon, that I learned about not only in history but in the military service.
    In the same way the left can be bigoted yet has no tolerance for bigotry, the Right wing can be rebellious and unlawful even though it has no tolerance for dissent of any kind, unless it’s aimed at liberals or done in the name of protecting big business (which they refuse to see as not only in bed with big government, but also not real capitalism, Ron Paul called it a form of capitalism that sets people up for failure). Although the Right Wing doesn’t riot as much or protest as much, they still protest and riot more than like to admit, and they make vicious threats to Obama when they rioted. They also aren’t above ignoring their more extreme elements of white or Christian supremacists taking the law in their own hand and acting like little white thugs to people they don’t like.
    Trash is trash, people.
    Look, I don’t love or hate Trump, I didn’t love or hate Obama. Books could be written trying to figure out exactly what’s their fault and what’s not, because quite frankly any president has very little power. They’re not going to save us.
    But from my POV, a police state is big government, unconstitutional, and the reason why the founding fathers wanted us to have guns. Although the left shows it’s ass in over doing their right to protest and abusing it at times, the sins of the recent militarized police begin to rival that of despotic regimes like Saddam. The number of rapes the police have committed as a whole is shocking. The connections to drug cartels and even ISIS, the fact that the same people in government that funded ISIS and Drug Cartels also just gutted gear from the military and handed them over to the police, the fact we’ve known about KKK and NeoNazi groups infiltrating police and have done nothing about it even when we had names and numbers, the amounts of child porn and drugs found with police is just the tip of the ice berg, and no accountability for these guys? Why, cuz they’re white and stupid, and you hate smart assed liberals? Do you hate cats so much that you allow a rapid dog in your house just because you hate cats? You allow a rapid dog with a history of violence near your wives and children because it’s “less of a threat than a robber?”
    Get real.
    Although the sins of the left with their protests are annoying and stupid, and they might be in for a good ass whoopin’, the sins of the police lately, leaving out black people even (like if you ignored all cases against blacks and just focused on what was done to predominately white victims, including a LOT of veterans), is far worse, even if it’s under the surface.
    In comparison, the sins of the left are like a dog chained up. It’s potentially dangerous, and makes a ruckus and a mess, but what the police state has become is like a poisonous viper in the grass that you don’t see, that gets it’s fatal bite in while you’re staring down a yappy dog.
    The sins of the left are like a child throwing a temper tantrum on the street, maybe breaking a few things and even hitting on person in the balls. Terrible, and deserving of a spanking to say the least, but the sins of the police state are like that of an adult who knows how to act in public, so he’s less annoying to the adults, but he’s murdered a few people, does drugs, and has paid for an abortion or 2 while also perhaps taking advantage of a woman while drunk.
    I know you guys don’t like the leftist protests.
    I think some of you even mean well. If it was exactly the way they sugar coated it in this article, I’d be more for it. By my time in the army and tracking the police state makes me very scared. Because quite frankly, there are 2 kinds of PC’s destroying our nation’s freedom at the moment. On the left it’s political correctness, which hurts and insults us but is really more of a nuissance. On the right, it’s Police Corruption. Between Black Lives Matter, Blue Lives Matter, and actual red commies, they are beating America’s will black, blue, and red all over.
    And the thing is, although I do not like the PC SJW crowd and they definitely should not get their way, I’m afraid the response and reaction against them will be more dangerous and unconstitutional than their bickering.
    It’s kind of like why men are held to a higher standard than women when it comes to violence. It’s bad when a woman hits men or constantly bitches at them. But usually, if a man starts taking swings at a woman he’s likely to do more physical damage than the woman ever could.
    I say this, because one day you conservatives could be having a protest of your own, and even if you don’t break anything and “do everything right”, it won’t stop you from getting run over. Yes, you do protest. Usually abortion clinics.
    So the right wing might want to stop it’s war on protests, because it really does mean all protests. They see all protests as riots. And we need to remember our country was founded on rebellion. Remember the tea party? Remember how you guys complain about “big government” all the time? If you want your house defended from robbers, don’t get a rabid guard dog that’s more likely to kill your wife and children.

  106. Suzannd Cook

    January 23, 2017 at 12:29 pm

    Please date your stories. I can’t tell if this is recent, ie the Inauguration, or from November. If I know when it was published, it’s easier to follow up.

  107. Douglas C Chadwick

    January 23, 2017 at 1:40 pm

    they should take away all gov. benfits…….then you will sees them protest again

  108. Cindy

    January 23, 2017 at 7:04 pm

    There is nothing official that says anything about 3 million illegal votes. The group that claims this is a right wing group, no an independent or non partisan group. All votes were verified by states, both red and blue. I very much believe in the US Constitution: freedom of speech, freedom to peacefully assemble, freedom to not live under Christian law… oh wait, aren’t a bunch of bills against abortion based on attacking women’s freedom based on religious grounds? After all, the concept of life begins at conception came out of the Roman Catholic church and is not embraced by all those of other religions or no religions.

  109. Daniel LeVar

    January 24, 2017 at 10:13 am

    Great Article……right to the point……Although I have what I believe is a better solution – why not one to five years community service – and while doing community service – have to wear clothing of some nature that shows that they are in fact – one of the demonstrators that loot and destroy property……I don’t know if that’s possible – but I feel it’s workable…..I have a question ? How many of these people are on assistance programs… welfare and such….?

  110. Patrick

    January 24, 2017 at 2:06 pm

    Listen, leave the tin foil hat at home. We have a system and sometimes it has to be tweaked. Especially when idiot law makers try to please morons. I expect Pres.Trump will bring law and order because his assets are affected. But remember, this is a billionaire who gave up ALLOT to be our leader. Let’s give him some time to sort out Barry’s mess.

  111. Kay Servant

    January 24, 2017 at 2:13 pm

    You are assholes if you approve of this. It goes against everything the founding fathers stood for

  112. Haza

    January 24, 2017 at 2:49 pm

    I didn’t read all the comments but they’re not taking away the right to Protest. They are saying if you do damage or harm to any person or thing while protesting then you will be charged. Didn’t any of you read the article or did you just pick out what you wanted to read as usual

  113. Carmen

    January 26, 2017 at 11:40 am

    There is a war going on in America and across the World. Those who side with satan and his global one world government and who Do NOT want the Real Creator God against those who want Real Creator God and His Word and who expect that the document called the Constitution protects us from the tyranny of the Godless. This war is predicted in the Bible and we are shown exactly how it will end. The Christians will be removed from this world suddenly one day by Lord Jesus Christ. We will disappear. After that point, a man will come who will promise peace if all the people of the world turn their national sovereignty over to him and serve him as the World Leader. Satan will have been thrown out of heaven at this time and he will enter into the man who is One World Leader. He will be very evil, but very charismatic and people who don’t believe in God and don’t know the Bible Prophecies will believe him. He will make a Peace Treaty with Israel, who all the nations of the earth will be standing against-very similar to the way they are right now. He will promise them 7 years of Peace, but 3 1/2 years in, he will attack Israel and go to Jerusalem and stand in the Temple and declare himself God. He will slaughter most of the Israeli’s, though a remnant will be able to escape to the Wilderness where The Real God Almighty will protect them for the final 3 1/2 years. There will be hell on earth as has never been seen before. The final battle will happen at Megiddo. Lord Jesus will destroy the armies of the anti-christ in a horrific battle. The blood will run as high as the horses bridles. satan will leave the man called anti-christ and will be captured in the spirit by the Angels of the Most High God. He will be locked in chains for 1000 years. The man who was inhabits the body of the anti-christ and his false prophet will be thrown alive into the Lake of Fire and will be the first inhabitants of that awful place. Then, Lord Jesus will gather the humans who have survived the 7 years of Tribulation. He will separate the sheep from the goats, meaning His People from satan’s subjects. Lord Jesus will welcome His Followers into the Kingdom while the goats will be sent to Hades to await the Final Judgment. Lord Jesus will establish His Kingdom on Earth for 1000 years. This is all the Utopia there is going to be liberals. Lord Jesus will be King and the Capital shall be Jerusalem.

  114. Roberta Gabor

    January 28, 2017 at 10:38 am

    Rioting and destroying of property is not protesting. Its vandalism and breaking the law.

  115. Karen

    January 28, 2017 at 9:05 pm

    How is that there are so many here that don’t see a difference between ‘peaceful protest’ and looting, killing, destroying property. Why is it so very difficult to see the difference? much of the lame stream media is reporting that Trump is making laws to stop protesting. If they had some ability to be truthful they would report that Trump and the rest of us, do not want property destroyed, cars burned, people killed or freeways blocked over political differences or anything else.

  116. Candy Fowler

    January 29, 2017 at 5:53 pm

    Great story ! I am so glad to see that they are trying to get all these crazy protesters under some kind of control . Protesting is fine , but making it violent , or a daily job to protest anything , , ect… heck yes they need all suggested in the story , fines , jail , hell even add counseling ! This will teach the younger generation a lesson and hope their children will not ever have to know how bad their parents acted…. and called a SNOWFLAKE ..ooops did I say that ? lmbo GROW UP !

  117. Frankie

    February 9, 2017 at 12:42 am

    The liberals just keep push shoving and tramping on everyone’s rights and were stupid enough to think they would get their way by doing it cause dear ole Obama and Hillary just ignored their bad lawless behavior , well, now, it is about to come back and bite them right in their silly backsides, keep pokin a grizzly and sooner or later he’s gonna turn around and smack ya clear across the cabbage patch. America is tired to the teeth of the liberal entitlement mind set and the nasty selfish whining about doing as they damn well please and Uncle Sam has said enough, so all you babies best get used to the idea that actions have consequences and you play you pay, and best of all get used to the word NO, you don’t get to destroy our country any more and yes you will be held accountable for your childish , selfish, thoughtless behavior from now on!

  118. Mike

    February 9, 2017 at 7:17 am

    Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof; or abridging the freedom of speech, or of the press; or the right of the people PEACEABLY to assemble, and to petition the Government for a redress of grievances.

    Notice the word PEACEABLY, which defines HOW the people may assemble.

    Also, the author is misinformed about where these rights stem from. “You have rights that are given to you from the Constitution” is incorrect. We are BORN with these rights and the Constitution and Bill of Rights only defines and protects these rights.

  119. docbobbyk

    March 11, 2017 at 1:46 pm

    Your mistake was asking an intelligent question motivated by wanting to get at the truth of a matter. In trump country someone such as yourself will be pretty lonely.

  120. Doug

    June 5, 2017 at 12:40 pm

    Bunch cry babies . It didn’t say take rights away from protesting. Retards read what you want and turn everything else around to best fits you snowflakes. There difference between protesting and rioting.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *